• aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This is what makes me sad. Like take the Apple vision pro for instance, there are potentially many great use cases for such a technology, such as real life ad blocking, assistance with various tasks, etc. Yet we get this obnoxious looking, expensive, obtrusive headset that uses cameras to view the real world for some reason, with dystopian avatars and completely locked down Apple software. The thing won’t even let users watch VR porn by default, you have to turn on a special setting lol, that’s how locked down it is. That the web browser does not allow VR content by default.

  • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    8 months ago

    Capitalism decided to run the “million monkeys banging on a million typewriters you eventually get Shakespeare” experiment except with AI and now we are flooding the internet with dogshit instead of a million pages of gibberish and the occasional haiku dedicated to bananas.

    • sexywheat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      8 months ago

      Best take I’ve heard so far on AI is to compare to Jurassic Park and the old “you were to focused on whether or not you could and not whether or not you should” quote. Scientists in real life don’t do that, they don’t just think of the craziest shit they could dream up and then do it and just see what happens. But apparently fucking computer engineers do.

      • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This is because a lot of software engineers aren’t actually engineers. I know it’s a controversial opinion to state online, but it’s true. Think about how many IT students or professionals complain about taking an ethics class. That would not be tolerated in other engineering fields. Software in general is still in the wild west phase, and it doesn’t help that almost every attempt to regulate the field has been a blatantly obvious corporate power grab or an attempt to create a monopoly, which will obviously not go down well.

        • operacion_ogro [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          8 months ago

          wdym software engineers aren’t actually engineers, do you have any idea how hard it is to use a JavaScript library to make a button do something slightly different than it already does?

      • flan [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        There are absolutely scientists and mathematicians and physicists involved in all of this. Software engineers don’t have the math background to make this stuff happen by themselves. Software engineers are the ones plumbing things together. Being a scientist doesn’t shield you from OpenAI holding a fat 7-figure check in front of your face and you saying “yes daddy”

        • Kindness@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          Software engineers don’t have the math background

          Not all “engineers” are self-taught/bootcamp webdevs. Some of us CS nerds still exist, who took a reasonable route to learn discrete maths, calculus, networking, and selling-your-soul-1010.

  • bazingabrain [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Yeah this is a massive problem for us 3D artists. Finding references has become a big problem…

    But keep pumping out takes that AI is necessary to express yourself or that we’re stupid luddites for hating this stuff!

    I normally avoid struggle sessions on this topic since practically no one involved seems to A) use AI in any way or B) feels the squeeze of these things but I’m going to start getting a bit more involved now that this is affecting more people, and I’m sorry but if I see more takes like “AI is helping me deal with my aphantasia and ur a bigot for dismissing it” (a real fucking take ive seen on here btw), I will reply guy you to death.

    • The_Jewish_Cuban [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t mean to be rude but it literally is luddism. Image generative AI and LLM’s are only a problem because people release them onto the web in whatever harebrained manner they see fit. Under a different form of production, where the development and implementation of such materials is directed by central planning which could account for this foreseeable issues, this tool could be limited to quarantined zones where people can mess around with it, but it’s not leaking out into databases that are generally a storage of human thought. Thus this problem of digital kessler syndrome wouldn’t happen. I don’t think you’re stupid luddites. You’re right in that this manifestation of the tech does in fact need to be smashed. However, in the way you’ve said it here, it seems like you’re throwing the baby out with the bathwater and condemning a technology which does not bring itself into existence.

      • bazingabrain [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Luddism was a rational reaction to something used to crush a very early form of working class, the luddites weren’t the stupid assholes theyre commonly portrayed at, you might want to self crit on using an ancient cliché whipped up by factory owners and capitalists because yikes.

        Its amusing to get this kind of accusation because I do unfortunately use AI, ive used it for years before it exploded like it did back in 2022-23, yet i always thought of it as yet another stupid grift, used only to bypass artistic process and come up with the most boring slop with the widest appeal.

        • The_Jewish_Cuban [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I can see how my comment implied that I think Luddites are idiots but that wasn’t my intention. “I don’t think you’re stupid luddites” as in I don’t think your qualms are stupid. Furthermore, I don’t think Luddites were either. That being said, I will critique them as Marx did. Early Luddism did explicitely destroy factory equipment. I will note that when I say that it is based merely on Marx’s comments in capital in reference to the movement. I’m not a historian and my knowledge of them ends there. If you have new information to contradict his account then please pass it along.

          The enormous destruction of machinery that occurred in the English manufacturing districts during the first 15 years of this century, chiefly caused by the employment of the power-loom, and known as the Luddite movement, gave the anti-Jacobin governments of a Sidmouth, a Castlereagh, and the like, a pretext for the most reactionary and forcible measures. It took both time and experience before the work people learnt to distinguish between machinery and its employment by capital, and to direct their attacks, not against the material instruments of production, but against the mode in which they are used. (pg 287 on marxists.org)

          Getting your way of life destroyed and being pissed off at the means in which it is done is understandable. However, to my understanding of this part of Capital, the Luddites did make this mistake. That’s not stupid. It’s understandable if not misguided. So when I say “it literally is Luddism” I meant that it seemed like you’re saying the technology is necessarily evil. Technology on it’s own literally cannot be evil. It is inanimate and its application is brought about by people. When I read your comment it seemed to me as though you were overlooking this.

          It’s amusing to get this kind of accusation

          First off, don’t write like a redditor. Don’t be a pompous ass who writes for the audience and just talk with me.

          I’m not accusing you of any thing. In fact, my language usage explicitly acknowledges my own fallibility. I specifically used a word like “seems” to show this. That is to show that there may be a breakdown in communication rather than disagreement.

  • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Based

    I remember back when I used 4chan, there was a guy on the art board who liked drawing birds. He was asking if anyone knew how to get into contact with academic/scientific publishers because he wanted to provide drawings for bird researchers. I still think about him sometimes

  • Mardoniush [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    8 months ago

    That last one horrifes me. The restoration looks nothing like the guy. They’ve just erased the dude’s image from history like a particularly disliked Pharaoh.

  • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is extremely cool actually, introducing a bunch of noise and inaccuracies into the AI models that might compound over time.

    Best twist in the AI progression I’ve seen in years.

    • laziestflagellant [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The problem is that AI image models aren’t dynamic like that. The AI groups already successfully pulled off the heist of the internet and went home with their image data sets with billions of images. The infinitely expanding google images AI slop isn’t getting fed back into the model the same way Chat GPT is auto-lobotimizing itself by looking up autogenerated articles on the web.

      In fact, at the moment newer AI image models are being refined not by being fed more images but by going back and adding more refined captions to their existing hoard, since the more descriptive the captions the more capable the resulting model tends to be. But hey, they’re generating most of the captions with Chat GPT and at least that’s fucking them over a bit I guess