• HexBroke [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 months ago

      On February 23, 1998, Netscape created the Mozilla Organization to co-ordinate the development of the Mozilla Application Suite.

      When AOL (Netscape’s parent) drastically scaled back its involvement with Mozilla Organization, the Mozilla Foundation was launched on July 15, 2003, to ensure Mozilla could survive without Netscape.

      AOL assisted in the initial creation of the Mozilla Foundation, transferring hardware and intellectual property to the organization, employed a three-person team for the first three months of its existence to help with the transition, and donated $2 million to the foundation over two years.

    • JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Netscape was the sacrifice for Firefox. In the before times, there was the problem of slow and bloated browsers before memory was plentiful (and easy to download😉) so Mozilla created Phoenix which was a lightweight no frills browser that crashed every time I tried to open a jpeg with it, but other than that it was awesome and so much faster than IE or Netscape. Then due to a lawsuit, or threat of one, they changed the name to Firefox which stayed winning until about 3.5 when Chrome started really taking over in speed and abilities. :abe-simpson:

      • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        eh, netscape 4.7 was an incredibly fast and stable browser IIRC. but it was being left behind in the features department.

        then the next netscape they released was called mozilla (and was a huge rewrite), which had all the features but was dog-slow.

        THEN they released phoenix/firefox, which was somehow mozilla but not quite, and that was faster (but still nowhere as fast as netscape 4.7).

        that’s how i remember it.

  • SnowySkyes [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve been using “Not Chrome” for 20 years and I’m not changing anytime soon. Always has been reliable for me. Though I wish they didn’t change their icon.

  • roux [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Firefox is best unless you have 224,538 tabs open. Or so I’ve heard.

    I checked yesterday and my extensions were also taking up 1.3 GB of ram. I think one has a memory leak or some shit but idk which. Firefox just takes forever to launch for me and after a couple days of running it goes to a crawl.

    E: thanks everyone for trying to help me btw E2: I might be an idiot. I think it might have been the amazing 2 GB of cached data I just deleted.

    • CarbonScored [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      As someone with literally 1.5 thousand open tabs - Firefox is way better than Chrome. Launches in ~10 seconds. Both use insane memory honestly, a few gigs, but that’s modern internet for you.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Hard drive? Firefox loads in under a second on all of my machines, including a nine-year-old desktop and a raspberry pi that’s running off’a SD card. Actually, the pi takes between 1-2 seconds.

            • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Strange! My SSDs on my old machines are old as shit hahaha.

              Would reinstalling and creating a new profile help, I wonder?

              • roux [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                So I did check my cached data and it was almost 2 GB. I deleted it and it’s running a lot faster now. The reason I never considered that is because I thought that in 2024, deleting browser cache wasn’t really needed anymore.

                • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Weird, I’ve never had to do that! Maybe just a weird fuckup on* the program’s side? Stranger things have happened, I suppose!

                  My partner’s Firefox is firefucked—some sites are just all black, some load super weird, some are unreadable. We know it’s the profile but have been too lazy to fix it… for over a year now. I feel like it’d be easy to fix. New profile, save the bookmarks, done. Yet here we are, using it all fucked up. Netflix and Twitch just crash if we’re not in a private window hahaha.

    • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t know what you mean, I have more tabs than that open and they unload if I haven’t opened them in awhile. memory usage doesn’t scale with number of tabs. I think your extensions are bugged.

      • roux [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wish I could see what extension is taking up what ram allocation but FF’s task manager just have a listing for “extensions” and that was when I found out that after a long time it goes up to 1.3 GB from like a normal 300 MB. I think at the end of the day I’m gonna just need to play extension roulette and see if I can find which one it might be. But it literally takes 10 minutes to load FF on startup.

        • alexandra_kollontai [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          extensions can each have a performance impact that adds up, so it can be good to turn off any uncommonly used or redundant ones. like having multiple ad blockers installed doesn’t block the ads twice as hard, it just means they each have to run on every page

    • Tomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      When I transitioned to Firefox from Chrome, I did so in large part because it at least was better at managing 224,538 open tabs. At the very least at the time, it seems that Chrome held all of the information about the tabs in RAM.

    • RoabeArt [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Firefox is the best, but I noticed Edge is more snappy at loading pages. Especially if its a page with a lot of images. But Edge is for libs, so I don’t use it.

      The conspiratorial side of me wants to believe that websites are coded to perform poorly when a non-Chrome browser is using them, in order to get people to switch to Chrome or Edge or whatever. Like the site detects the User Agent as “Firefox” and lowers its download speed.

      • lapis [fae/faer, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        websites are coded to perform poorly when a non-Chrome browser is using them

        many of them basically are, but not intentionally. a lot of web developers only test in Chrome, and Chrome does some really weird shit (especially with JS and CSS) that means if you target Chrome you’re passively degrading the experience for not-Chrome.

        I personally develop my code targeting Firefox or Safari most of the time, since both work a lot closer to spec with JS and CSS than Chrome does.

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          There’s circumstantial evidence that most of google’s sites degrade performance intentionally.

          And plenty of sites try to stop you with a “only works on chrome” message, but work perfectly fine if you just spoof your browser string to look like you’re using chrome.

      • roux [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        For me, when I use FF in private mode or troubleshooting mode, it’s snappy as fuck so it’s all on me lol. I’m running a dark mode extension that does client side rerenderimg on page load which is pretty heavy but like I also have 32GB of ram to use.

        After a ton of testing I can’t really tell if it’s too many tabs or too many extensions. I have a leaky habit of leaving tabs open because what if I need it later? And like right now I’m building a theme for AstroJS so I have like 12 tabs open just for that. I also have like 8 pinned tabs for my most used sites like proton, Gmail, reddit, Hexbear, SoundCloud, etc. I think it’s mostly just my bad browsing habits.

        I like to be as FOSS as possible so FF isn’t going away for me any time soon.

    • neo [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      You can go to about:profiles and then relaunch the web browser with all add ons disabled to see if that changes things up for you. Though I imagine browsing the web without uBlock Origin on is its own special hell.

      • roux [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have wondered if it is my uBO that is making things load so slow. But don’t Donna get rid of it because special hell like you said. I use the most popular dark mode extension. And people have reported that that one can slow down but I cant imagine it would slow down this bad.

      • roux [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I just ran it without extensions and it’s the same. Only thing I can really think is the amount of tabs. I can go to a private tab, and basically any sites loads instantly.

    • zkrzsz [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      You may not need all those tabs. Create a new profile and roll with it, you can always launch the old profile if you need something from the old tabs.

    • lemming934@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Here’s a quote from the Wikipedia page:

      In 2016, Opera was acquired by an investment group led by a Chinese consortium, the consortium included several Chinese companies such as Kunlun Tech and Qihoo 360.

  • Pili [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    Android Not Chrome would always make my entire phone freeze, apparently many people have that issue. I haven’t had that problem with Android Chinese Chrome so far.

    But Not Chrome is still the best by far on computer of course.

    • Zvyozdochka [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Meh, it’s just Firefox with a config applied out of the box and some new branding. They don’t really patch anything of importance out of Firefox, pretty much all of their patches are just changes for their branding/styling.

      You can find the config that comes out of the box here: https://codeberg.org/librewolf/settings/src/branch/master/librewolf.cfg which appears to just be https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/blob/master/user.js with a couple of extra things added like Brave’s query stripping list.

        • Zvyozdochka [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Which you will most likely be able to disable with a policy.json just like Librewolf does with Pocket and other Mozilla services. I personally rather just build Firefox from Mozilla’s sources and use my own configuration rather than having to put trust into some third-party to do that for me. Though I understand that is definitely not everyone’s cup of tea, so I guess Librewolf is good enough for the majority of people. Though I’d be weary because a lot of the settings Librewolf enables (namely the things under privacy.resistFingerprinting) break a lot of websites which some people may not want to deal with. In that case, I’d just take Arkenfox’s configuration and remove all that stuff from it and call it a day.

  • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Firefox is more like Chrome’s little sibling, tagging along and going to all the same places. I wish it would grow up and decide for itself where to go and how to get there. I’m hopeful with the Manifest V3 resistance that this is changing.

    • CarbonScored [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      It doesn’t really have a choice, unfortunately. Any little way that Firefox deviates from Chrome basically just breaks stuff, because Google have successfully forced through their will about every web standard ever.