The Brief Origins of May Day

In the late nineteenth century, the working class was in constant struggle to gain the 8-hour work day. Working conditions were severe and it was quite common to work 10 to 16 hour days in unsafe conditions. Death and injury were commonplace at many work places and inspired such books as Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle and Jack London’s The Iron Heel. As early as the 1860’s, working people agitated to shorten the workday without a cut in pay, but it wasn’t until the late 1880’s that organized labor was able to garner enough strength to declare the 8-hour workday. This proclamation was without consent of employers, yet demanded by many of the working class.

At this time, socialism was a new and attractive idea to working people, many of whom were drawn to its ideology of working class control over the production and distribution of all goods and services. Workers had seen first-hand that Capitalism benefited only their bosses, trading workers’ lives for profit. Thousands of men, women and children were dying needlessly every year in the workplace, with life expectancy as low as their early twenties in some industries, and little hope but death of rising out of their destitution. Socialism offered another option.

At its national convention in Chicago, held in 1884, the Federation of Organized Trades and Labor Unions (which later became the American Federation of Labor), proclaimed that “eight hours shall constitute a legal day’s labor from and after May 1, 1886.” The following year, the FOTLU, backed by many Knights of Labor locals, reiterated their proclamation stating that it would be supported by strikes and demonstrations.

An estimated quarter million workers in the Chicago area became directly involved in the crusade to implement the eight hour work day, including the Trades and Labor Assembly, the Socialistic Labor Party and local Knights of Labor. As more and more of the workforce mobilized against the employers, these radicals conceded to fight for the 8-hour day, realizing that “the tide of opinion and determination of most wage-workers was set in this direction.” With the involvement of the anarchists, there seemed to be an infusion of greater issues than the 8-hour day. There grew a sense of a greater social revolution beyond the more immediate gains of shortened hours, but a drastic change in the economic structure of capitalism.

In a proclamation printed just before May 1, 1886, one publisher appealed to working people with this plea:

Workingmen to Arms!

War to the Palace, Peace to the Cottage, and Death to LUXURIOUS IDLENESS.

The wage system is the only cause of the World’s misery. It is supported by the rich classes, and to destroy it, they must be either made to work or DIE.

One pound of DYNAMITE is better than a bushel of BALLOTS!

MAKE YOUR DEMAND FOR EIGHT HOURS with weapons in your hands to meet the capitalistic bloodhounds, police, and militia in proper manner.

Not surprisingly the entire city was prepared for mass bloodshed, reminiscent of the railroad strike a decade earlier when police and soldiers gunned down hundreds of striking workers. On May 1, 1886, more than 300,000 workers in 13,000 businesses across the United States walked off their jobs in the first May Day celebration in history. In Chicago, the epicenter for the 8-hour day agitators, 40,000 went out on strike with the anarchists in the forefront of the public’s eye. With their fiery speeches and revolutionary ideology of direct action, anarchists and anarchism became respected and embraced by the working people and despised by the capitalists.

The names of many - Albert Parsons, Johann Most, August Spies and Louis Lingg - became household words in Chicago and throughout the country. Parades, bands and tens of thousands of demonstrators in the streets exemplified the workers’ strength and unity, yet didn’t become violent as the newspapers and authorities predicted.

More and more workers continued to walk off their jobs until the numbers swelled to nearly 100,000, yet peace prevailed. It was not until two days later, May 3, 1886, that violence broke out at the McCormick Reaper Works between police and strikers.

For six months, armed Pinkerton agents and the police harassed and beat locked-out steelworkers as they picketed. Most of these workers belonged to the “anarchist-dominated” Metal Workers’ Union. During a speech near the McCormick plant, some two hundred demonstrators joined the steelworkers on the picket line. Beatings with police clubs escalated into rock throwing by the strikers which the police responded to with gunfire. At least two strikers were killed and an unknown number were wounded.

As the speech wound down, two detectives rushed to the main body of police, reporting that a speaker was using inflammatory language, inciting the police to march on the speakers’ wagon. As the police began to disperse the already thinning crowd, a bomb was thrown into the police ranks. No one knows who threw the bomb, but speculations varied from blaming any one of the anarchists, to an agent provocateur working for the police.

Enraged, the police fired into the crowd. The exact number of civilians killed or wounded was never determined, but an estimated seven or eight civilians died, and up to forty were wounded. One officer died immediately and another seven died in the following weeks. Later evidence indicated that only one of the police deaths could be attributed to the bomb and that all the other police fatalities had or could have had been due to their own indiscriminate gun fire. Aside from the bomb thrower, who was never identified, it was the police, not the anarchists, who perpetrated the violence.

Eight anarchists - Albert Parsons, August Spies, Samuel Fielden, Oscar Neebe, Michael Schwab, George Engel, Adolph Fischer and Louis Lingg - were arrested and convicted of murder, though only three were even present at Haymarket and those three were in full view of all when the bombing occurred. On November 11, 1887, after many failed appeals, Parsons, Spies, Engel and Fisher were hung to death. Louis Lingg, in his final protest of the state’s claim of authority and punishment, took his own life the night before with an explosive device in his mouth.

The remaining organizers, Fielden, Neebe and Schwab, were pardoned six years later by Governor Altgeld, who publicly lambasted the judge on a travesty of justice. Immediately after the Haymarket Massacre, big business and government conducted what some say was the very first “Red Scare” in this country. Spun by mainstream media, anarchism became synonymous with bomb throwing and socialism became un-American. The common image of an anarchist became a bearded, eastern European immigrant with a bomb in one hand and a dagger in the other.

Today we see tens of thousands of activists embracing the ideals of the Haymarket Martyrs and those who established May Day as an International Workers’ Day. Ironically, May Day is an official holiday in 66 countries and unofficially celebrated in many more, but rarely is it recognized in this country where it began.

Over one hundred years have passed since that first May Day. In the earlier part of the 20th century, the US government tried to curb the celebration and further wipe it from the public’s memory by establishing “Law and Order Day” on May 1.

Truly, history has a lot to teach us about the roots of our radicalism. When we remember that people were shot so we could have the 8-hour day; if we acknowledge that homes with families in them were burned to the ground so we could have Saturday as part of the weekend; when we recall 8-year old victims of industrial accidents who marched in the streets protesting working conditions and child labor only to be beat down by the police and company thugs, we understand that our current condition cannot be taken for granted - people fought for the rights and dignities we enjoy today, and there is still a lot more to fight for. The sacrifices of so many people can not be forgotten or we’ll end up fighting for those same gains all over again. This is why we celebrate May Day.

https://archive.iww.org/history/library/misc/origins_of_mayday/

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • stigsbandit34z [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why can’t all left leaning types recognize that free speech is an illusion AND that the constitution wasn’t written with them in mind? Is it really that hard?

    Doing anything else makes it easy af for chuds to zero in on some serious hypocrisy

    • Rojo27 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This is something that has bothered me for a while. Someone I knew in school who, for a while, posted Green Party stuff on their feed during the 2020 election. She’s a well meaning radlib from the few times we spoke in the past. But she would post some stuff that amounted to coopting elements of American patriotism and the Consitution to push points about liberation for POC and LGBTQ people. And all I could think was whether this was really something that the left should undertake.

      Honestly, fuck the Consitution. I think many people make the mistake of thinking that it’s a slightly flawed, but absolutely essential document pertaining to a free society even though it was written by land, and some slave, owning white men. There’s no redeeming value to it and if a revolution ever happened it should also come with a completely new constitution.

    • ashinadash [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s sort of a naïve but egalitarian idea that if everyone could just respectfully freeze peach at eachother, the good ideas would win out in a bloodless and respectful fashion. This assumes that nobody has motives like “I want to kill minorities” and people just need to be logic’d at.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        Libs really, really cannot handle ideas like “these people aren’t uninformed or under educated or whatever, they just like hurting people who can’t defend themselves. They do it for fun.”

        • ashinadash [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 months ago

          To be more fair than libs deserve, it is sort of a horrific realisation that the vast majority of westoids are just bastardy at their core, it’s nicer to think that all the Proud Boys are just misled by A Dang Cheeto who’s a bad actor or whatever. But it’s a deeply unserious and immaterial view of course, and libs are cowards for hiding behind this instead of facing the reality we live in.

        • Poogona [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m stuck here too on a sort of moral ledge with the idea that some people are just bad on an essential level behind me, and with the ocean of “people are products of their societies and you are surrounded by twisted victims while also being one of them” in front of me.

          I am not sure I have the emotional constitution to face the ocean and try to understand it tbh, and it frightens me even more to think of getting lost in there and being wrong, rendering all that effort to understand some better nature of my species wasted on those who would spit my faith in them back at me anyway.

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t think it’s a “man is evil in his nature” thing. Just for whatever reason, the fash like hurting people. idk if it’s environmental, genetic, developmental, whatever. but they’re here and they do.

            • Poogona [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah I agree, I phrased it bluntly but it’s just scary to think that whatever radiation in the psychic atmosphere of places like the US and Israel nurses fascism is the same atmosphere I live in. I don’t really fear becoming truly reactionary but it feels like the moment I let my guard down and stop squinting I’ll get misled into someone getting dehumanized. I guess I want to believe there’s some kind of set of explanations for why societies turn so cruel so that treatment can begin, like with lead or microplastics.

      • stigsbandit34z [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Ahh makes sense. I keep hoping that the logic types will recognize that their hardline logic that views people as numbers will eventually turn fascistic and genocidal, but unfortunately more and more seem to headed that way especially with the influx of algorithms

        Hate it here