• Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Which is actually a bad thing, because it doesn’t give voters a choice.

    • Swerker
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Whith only two parties there isnt much to choose between anyway

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        There’s more than two parties to choose from. There’s only two realistic choices because as a population you all choose to make it that way.

        Don’t get me wrong, the US isn’t alone here. We have the same problem here in the UK. I usually vote for a third party that more aligns with my own views, not one of the main two, and people tell me I “wasted my vote”. My response is: Did I waste my vote, or did you?

        Simpsons of course parodied the situation best when the two aliens both ran for president.

        • Syndic@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          There’s more than two parties to choose from.

          Technically true, but there is no real choice. The US doesn’t have a proportional voting system but uses first past the post voting. This by default will result in a two party system. If one party splits up or loses voter to a third party, the remaining party will utterly dominate the politics until one of the other party comes up on top again.

          Sane countries do have a proportional voting system which allows several parties to flourish.

          • r00ty@kbin.life
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s the point I (and the simpsons) is making though. If people didn’t vote for one of the two parties because “anything else is a wasted vote”. Even with FPTP you’d get a more varies result, at the very least in the upper/lower houses.

            But that doesn’t happen, and that’s how they have us all by the balls.

            • Syndic@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              But that doesn’t happen, and that’s how they have us all by the balls.

              Well that’s very easy when one party openly is working to destroy the whole democratic system.

              • r00ty@kbin.life
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Very specifically, in the upcoming US election. Going to say, yes you need to stop a certain tyrant from getting another term. But as a general comment this happens regardless.

                Even all the years, at least in the UK, for quite some time a decade or so ago we had two parties, one that was 1mm left of centre and the other 1mm right of centre. If people didn’t like the fact they had a choice of Kang or Kodos, they did. But, everyone voted that way anyway.

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          you all choose to make it that way.

          Boomers make it that way. They’ve made it that way for decades.