30 minutes is not nearly long enough to get to anything convoluted.

Jokes are supposed to be funny?

New Zealand isn’t a part of Australia?

Nowhere did I say kids shouldn’t do whatever they can to escape abuse, I wholeheartedly agree with that. I was addressing the fact that the original comment was saying that there should be no consequences regardless if it was an abusive environment.

These “silly teen things” could have very well ended with themselves or someone else dead.

You would trust random idiots on the internet to give you medical advice? How fucking stupid. People have died because of bad advice given on the internet, and you want to encourage this?

For every “miracle tip” there’s at least 10 fuckwits giving potentially dangerous advice.

I think that’s nothing compared to all the, y’know, irreparable destruction and pollution we do to the to the planet tbh.

What the fuck

Nah, screw that. I’m here for pointless petty arguments.

Someone obviously doesn’t speak to many women.

*Gestures vaguely around*

Everything?

For someone who calls Christians hate-mongering, you’re pretty hateful yourself.

It’ll increase demand, which should in theory increase wages for those jobs. A universal basic income is “basic” in the sense that it’s the minimum to survive in society. There will still be plenty of people who want more and are therefore willing to do those jobs.

That’s often easier said then done

That’s a fair assesment. But what’s the ratio games that you actually go back to compared to the amount of games you own in total? Unless you only play very few games, the amount of games a person owns vastly outnumbers the games they actually go back and play multiple times. Just looking at my steam library, I own hundreds of games I’ve completed once and have never touched again along with about 2 dozen I actually go back and play occasionally.

Guilty enough to deserve death?

How expensive? Because accounting for inflation, $66 in 1994 is worth about $136 in 2023.

What you’re describing is still toxic masculinity and has absolutely nothing to do with toxic femininity. Men that have been hurt by their previous partners or ridiculed for being emotional, is toxic masculinity. This is because men are discouraged from expressing their emotions or seeking support, reinforcing the harmful stereotype that vulnerability is a sign of weakness. Men get hurt by women doing this because of the toxic view many men and women carry about masculinity and male gender roles.

Toxic femininity on the other hand, is a societal expectation placed on women to conform to traditional gender roles and stereotypes, like being passive, nurturing, and submissive.

Yes. And the reason for that is toxic masculinity. That’s the point they were making. They were explaining the why, not the what.

Nice deflection, but it’s obvious from how furiously and continuously you defend your opinion that you’re also pretty “stressed” about this lol.