• Syndic@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    While I agree that it’s rather sad for developer not hosting their Wiki, I really never had any problem with the old hoster of the Minecraft Wiki. I certainly didn’t perceive it as a “crappy provider”. It did exactly what it needed to and there weren’t any intrusive adds or at least not to my attention. But maybe I’m just really good at ignoring adds myself.

    Edit: Or mabye my add blocker did help, hard to tell since I haven’t seen the internet without it since years now.

    • poppy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah Bulbapedia is fan-run and does exactly what it needs imo.

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ya, not all are the level of Fandom. The old one for Minecraft was somewhat tolerable without an ad-blocker. I don’t really feel it is fair to blame the providers either - even Fandom. They are stepping up to offer something nobody else feels like paying for.