Just some additional advertising for todays boycott.

  • brianary@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lots of naysayers trying to convince everyone not to participate, or to fragment efforts with competing ideas.

    So much of our consumer culture is buying shit we don’t need like impulse buys and stupid movies and fast food. That’s profitable stuff, and skipping that for one day doesn’t mean you’ll just buy it the next day.

  • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    One day won’t do much. I took it as a sign it was time to delete the Amazon and Walmart app from all my devices and move onto other services.

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I don’t get this plan.

    Even if people don’t shop one day, they will buy postponed items next day.

    You are organizing the wrong thing, you need to build a platform and a troll farm.

  • Sovereign@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    So what I dont understand is, even if one were to do a week long blackout of buying anything, we would still need to get milk and eggs and crap. So is the idea to switch from amazon to other stores or not spend altogether? Because not spending altogether is a pretty stupid and unrealistic goal.

  • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 days ago

    I didn’t know about this and still participated by accident. What I’m trying to say is that if 1 day counts as boycott I’m severely concerned by the overreliance the general public has on those companies.

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    158
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    We need PERMANENT boycotts. DON’T GO BACK!! Abandoned them and leave them to rot.

    Follow what I see every Canadian is doing in the grocery store. Look up the brand and if it’s American put it back and add to the permanent no buy list.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean im american but im pretty much like this. A bit limited with my wife but we don’t buy subscriptions, don’t have smartphones, and are getting our stuff second hand a lot now. Granted this has been a thing with us thats just been growing for like the last decade. Essentially we have just gotten more and more serious about and emphasizing more the first two parts of reduce, reuse, recycle.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s good people are doing something, but I can’t help but feel it would be way more effective if it was a sustained boycott of targeted businesses. Not buying anything for a year is impossible, but not buying anything from one particular store for a year is possible.

    Could you imagine the dread corporate would feel if they saw Banana Republic get boycotted for 2025 and looked at the boycott schedule and their name was listed under 2026?

    • eronth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yup. One day of no shopping means the big corps just weather a day of lower purchases and the next day people will be buying the stuff they skipped out on friday. It’s hardly a noticeable blip to them.

      • Rev. Layle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah as much as id like to see pressures on some corps, I think it is better to target certain corps.

        One day, as you said you are just buying the next day, or back loading a day earlier.

  • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Who organizes this shit??? Can I learn about this ahead of time so I don’t see the post literally at 10:30 on the night of the same day??

    Like literally

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m sure this one day boycott will be just as effective as the others were.

    If you want results you need to put in time and have a target. Conservatives didn’t boycott beer, they boycotted Bud Light. They didn’t do it for a day, they did it until Bud Light gave up. Say what you will about the “why” of it, but it was effective.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I posted another comment but they are effective if strong enough. If their metrics crash today it will worry them. Later if it can be followed up by two days, three, a week. Its a message. There are some more targeted ones on the calendar to. Might have actually been more effective for the artist to do a remember one yesterday but then again its nice to do a solidarity one today. We shall see how much people care to send a message or not.

      • peregrin5@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’re assuming anybody outside of Lemmy even knows about this. I haven’t seen any indication of that.

        • Kate-ay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 days ago

          I have, I received texts from friends and family about this protest that don’t even know what the fediverse is.

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t hang on other social media but im on them. my condo has a facebook page and I am looking for work on linkedin. I have seen it on these. but I can’t speak the the popularity because I only use these things the minimum necessary although the fact I saw them at all maybe says something.

        • sbexpert@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m a cashier, I was pleasantly surprised when a customer mentioned the blackout to me on Monday. I didn’t think anyone was talking about it offline. I’m hoping with all my heart that work is dead slow today, but knowing how backwards the people in my town are, I know it’s a Pipedream.

        • lance20000@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          A co-worker’s parents asked her about it and my coworker asked if I heard about. I think it’s spread further than you think.

          The reality is that this blackout might not change the world, but it can send a message about how united people are.

        • mushroomstormtrooper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          My boss’s boss mentioned it to me last week. I would be astonished if he was on any social media. Then again, he surprises me pretty regularly.

    • Kate-ay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Doing boycotts like this one is putting in time and having targets. No one thinks a single day of boycotting will change the world, it’s part of the process.

      One thing that definitely won’t get results is listening to people like you who shit on every effort to get a movement going, which is happening. There will be a next step, and another, and maybe one of those steps could be boycotting a single company or product like the Montgomery bus boycott or Pepsi during apartheid.

      Be constructive and not negative.

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I laid out what an effective boycott looks like with a specific recent example that accomplished what it set out to do. I’m not sure how much more constructive I can be. What would you consider to be constructive if not that?

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          People have absolutely gotten to a point where they don’t want any criticism even if it is meant to help us come up with plans.

          No plan or idea should be single in origin and it’s by the back and forth we find plans… But people are either right or wrong with no in-between in western culture.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Maybe, “This is good but y’know . . [example]” more than “this is dumb, a real [example]”

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      not sure but I can say this has been floating around for awhile as part of several on the fediverse with multiple dates. Since this is a cartoon they are just putting this up I think as more support than information. Here is a link from newsweek mentioning it a week or so ago and if you type in google feb 28th blackout you will see how many news places picked it up back then https://www.newsweek.com/nationwide-economic-blackout-february-28-list-stores-being-targeted-2030269 im not wild about the media coverage though as they say its all from one org and define it more narrowly than it should.

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Because unfortunately the point of these protests isn’t achieving change, it’s patting themselves on the back for their “positive action” (despite how conveniently non-intrusive said action is their lives and how it requires absolutely zero risk or material sacrifice).

      Since the point is to self-congratulate, no reason to wait, I guess.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Because this is the best people who are trying to be singular in deciding a low impact protest for their followers think of and rush to make it happen because instant gratification of a shorter turnaround time feels better with our shorter attention span.

      I’m still quite annoyed that this is still thought of as some community action when it is more or less a small group of people getting some of their friends across a large global space to agree that it sounds good and then hope everyone else just agrees and does it with no end goal in sight.

      It’s reactionary action without purpose or action.

  • UnPassive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, how’d everyone do? I had to order some magic cards so I stayed up until midnight to do it lol. I also need to replace a pvc pipe under my kitchen sink so that waited until today and I’ve been getting water from the bathroom…

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    If your protest is convenient it’s a shitty protest. I’m sorry, but this is a shitty protest.

    • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      That an corporations don’t care about their daily numbers unless they are trending. Like, people won’t buy stuff today, so they will just go buy the stuff tomorrow. Monthly and quarterly profits took no hit.

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Fully agree. While I wholeheartedly support the intent of this protest, it is entirely performative for the sake of the participants, not for the sake of actually affecting change.

        • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Gotta start somewhere with people. The point is that anyone can do this, and it’s easy to do, but it isn’t really any more difficult to show up to a town hall. And while yes, you and I can (and probably do) take larger, more effective steps, longer boycotts, etc. We need numbers, and that, I think, is the real value of this.

          • Vespair@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            A million times zero is still zero. We gain nothing by entirely performative action. Start somewhere, but make it somewhere meaningful.

              • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I suspect these types of actions are actually counter productive, because they take attention away from movements and causes that actually stand a chance of working, while having little to no effect on the business they’re targeting.

                There’s no way enough people took this seriously to move the needle on daily sales more than the regular sales fluctuations these stores would see.

              • Vespair@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                No thank you. I’m going to instead continue to rally against treating adults like coddled children and placating them in ways which dis-motivate them from actual collective action by convincing them that they’re already doing collective action. And I’m going to keep criticism bad ideas because good intention alone is not enough. I don’t give a shit about making people feel good or participating in the latest fun leftist trend, I care about meaningful impact.

                Feel free to block me if your find your feathers unable to be unruffled.

                • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Why would I block you, you’re your own biggest failure. That you are willing to put it on public display is an amusing commentary to me. Tagged and followed.

        • stickly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Honest question, what is an accessible first step for a population that has basically never performed any collective action that isn’t performative?

          Is standing outside a local government building holding a sign to protest federal policy affecting change?

          In my view, at least this one day action has a marginal economic impact. Holding a sign on your lunch break so you can post some pictures to Instagram is way more performative.

            • stickly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              I agree! So let’s all stop spending today to get people on board and save a few bucks, then use that momentum to pool that money the next day.

              People seem to dislike this protest because inaction is seen as ineffective and opposed to active protest. Its “too easy”, which puts a bad taste in their mouth.

              But on the other hand:

              • its dead easy
              • has no barrier to entry
              • has no regressive downside on those unable to spend
              • even partial participation can add up
              • is simple to communicate and organize
              • doing it for one day makes it easy to see how you could do it for longer. The hardest part of any diet is when you just start out

              If anything, I see putting the economic brakes on as allowing for more leverage and room to organize. If work is slow maybe you have more time to attend that protest; maybe you’re not in a rush to get back to the shop if it’s closed early.

          • Vespair@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            But it doesn’t have marginal impact. It has zero impact. Whether you spend money on Thursday or Friday, the bottom line is the same. We are starting from the false premise that this has any impact, when the smallest amount of critical thought renders that false immediately.

            Yes, get the hell out and stand in front of government offices with signs. Make noise. Be seen. Do anything other than pretending keeping your items in your shopping cart for one additional day has any impact.

            • stickly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              That’s completely backwards. It costs elected officials and our corporate overlords LITERALLY nothing to ignore your protest. It’s bad PR at best. Even then, manipulating news coverage, headlines and soundbites is second nature to these people.

              How long would an economic strike have to be for it to have an impact you won’t handwave away? There could be prepped food on shelves today that gets thrown out tomorrow. Do it over a weekend and no tickets get sold to a show. Do it for a week and logistics starts getting fucked up.

              Standing around and making noise without any other change to your lifestyle or attempting to organize your efforts is completely hollow. Not to mention, infinitely less accessible to people who can’t afford the time or don’t have the physical ability to attend.

              • Vespair@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Do it for a week and logistics starts getting fucked up.

                Yes, change the entire nature and scope of the protest and it might be impactful, I agree with you.

                Do it over a weekend and no tickets get sold to a show.

                …do you think people are still primarily buying event tickets from in-person box offices same day?

                • stickly@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  The point is that it has an impact that you’re arbitrarily ignoring. If you scale your sign holding and chanting up to 3 million people in a state capital then it might be impactful as well.

                  The key here is which of these is a more accessible and reasonable thing to ask people to do as a first action? Is it easier to organize 3 protests of 50,000 people in a month or have 500,000 cut their spending in half for a month?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Businesses tend to notice trends during economic upswings/downturns. To date, consumer spending has been steadily rising in no small part thanks to upward pressure on wages and inflationary pressure on prices. If we’re entering a recessionary spiral, you won’t need to have a “No Spending Day”. People will reflexively cut their spending when they lose their income.

        Something like this might have more teeth if it was paired with protest marches or sit-ins or other actions intended to signal that prices had run away from incomes. But that doesn’t seem to be the message this meme is sending. Nobody is getting encouraged to stand outside a Target and wave a big sign that says “Stop Bird Flu! Make Eggs Cheap Again!” or picketing an Amazon Warehouse over low wages and long hours.

    • rational_lib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I disagree with both the premise and the conclusion. Even if skipping corporate stuff for a day is only a mild inconvenience, that is still obviously not convenient. Second, there’s no reason to suspect convenience should strongly impact effectiveness. How much did it inconvenience anyone to boycott South Africa in the 80s?

      Maximizing effectiveness for unit of effort is smart. And when a tiny change in share price can make a big difference in CEO compensation, we’d be complete masochists not to use that in our favor. But also even if you’re into maximizing pain, if we wanna talk about permanently going after these corporations then it’s gotta start somewhere. And it’s best to start with getting people to do what’s easy.