• trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    You’re conflating game engines being open source with the games themselves being proprietary. Proprietary products can use (some) open source things, but it doesnt make the end product open source.

    Given that LLMs literally need the training data to be worth anything, releasing the final model without training data is not open source.

    • KeenFlame
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They did not release the final model without the data, they released the framework and tech to create it. It is not conflating, it is the same even with open source games (not engines) that art can be licensed. The open source refers to… The source… As you might guess

      • trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        They did not release the final model without the data

        They literally did exactly that. Show me the training data. If it has been provided under an open source license, then I’ll revise my statement.

        You literally cannot create a useful LLM without the training data. That is a part of the framework used to create the model, and they kept that proprietary. It is a part of the source. This is such an obvious point that I should not have to state it.