• horseloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Deepseek made a mistake with the first query I asked it, so from that sample of 1 I’m treating it with the same caution as any of the current LLMs.

    I asked it about testing an electronics part (an Integrated Circuit chip) and it confidently told me how to test an imaginary 16-pin version of the chip.

    The IC in question has 8 pins.

    When I followed up by asking “why pin 16” it confidently responded with a little lecture about what pin 16 does and just how important pin 16 is.

    Once I’d proved to it that the IC has 8 pins, I got this:

    “You’re absolutely correct that the MN3101 is an 8-pin DIP (Dual Inline Package) chip. My earlier reference to pin 16 was incorrect, and I appreciate your clarification. Let me provide accurate information for the MN3101 (8-pin DIP).”

    The thing is that these chips have a unique Id (the name) and publicly available datasheets that explain, amongst other things, how many pins they have.