• thevoidzero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    At least - no, in that case it wouldn’t have happened. At most half. I’d say it’s way below half.

      • ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Voters who (to add to your point), don’t represent half the country, because 90 million out of 240 million voters didn’t vote at all. I think the number of non-voters went up a bit but not too far away from the average pres. election

      • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m saying if at least half the population was horrified they’d have voted. The people that didn’t vote are apathetic. You can’t subtract people who voted for him from total and group them as against him

        • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          You can when there have been several news stories about groups who abstained or chose to vote 3rd party deeply regretting their choice.