You still haven’t provided any proof besides a link to another comment. Last comment.

What I’m saying is, they need to prove that because all that I’m saying is true.

ty

That’s not true, and they make money in lots of ways:

• They sell the end cap and shelf space. That’s why you see the cheap, simple stuff on the bottom shelves. To even show up in a store, a company has to pay to play. Think of it like the Google Play Store or Apple Store.
• They get bulk discounts and contracts to sell stuff.

Costco operates on thin margins because they make their money on the membership fees.

They know what they are doing is wrong so they feel the need to hide who they are.

Yep, like ICE

So, this would be based on crypto? That’s what I understand, like the stable coin. I have many questions that they didn’t really cover.

It seems that the way the dividends come about is by loaning out money, your $3 becomes $97. Is that correct? If so:

• Who is handling these transactions and overhead?
• What if people don’t pay back the loan?
• What if that money is stolen? Crypto can be easily corrupted and traced.

There’s more questions. I’m not trying to shoot it down, I just want to understand.

Edit, is it still tied to SOFR?

However, it may still be vulnerable to manipulation. Banks can borrow and lend at biased rates in the wholesale funding market, which can lead them to profit in the much larger market for benchmark-indexed contracts.[8] It was therefore suggested that the lending costs of individual banks be published to increase transparency and deter manipulation.[8]

The Bank for International Settlements, which serves as the bank for central banks, said in March 2019 that a one-size-fits-all alternative may be neither feasible nor desirable. Although SOFR solves the rigging problem, it does not help participants gauge how stressed global funding markets are. That means SOFR is likely to coexist with something else.[13]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOFR

Plus, it’s probably going to go to the food *desert areas first. I dig it.

Not enough available to tax

Right, tax the fucking wealthy. It’s insane how they hoard money.

Dude, every company that thought AI could take over a job, they tried it. Do you think they’re trying to keep employees?

He’s getting his apartment ready in hell.

What I’ve seen as the most talked about part of this is, how are we going to pay for it. Of course, wealth tax has to be a huge part of it. We’ve seen the following work, so it’s not hard to understand. The billionaires don’t want it:

• Social Security, but the companies only are the ones to foot the bill
• Alaska dividends, same concept but of course, a lot more money.
• Medicare, Medicaid and people on disability.

• Krita is free and awesome for that age. Maybe install it together. If you have a tablet or touch screen, it’s really fun.
• How familiar are you with (also free) Blender? You would have to install it and learn the basics. Just the 3d sculpting program might be a blast for him and have him edit a UV sphere. There are a few basic tips to get you going, but kids pick it up way easier than adults do.
  • The object mode is for the overall, individual objects
  • The edit mode is to work on, inside, the object you select
  • You absolutely have to have a scroll mouse
  • There is a description in the lower left corner that lets you edit the mesh you’re “adding” or putting in, then it goes away. This messes up a lot of people.
  • At the top are tabs that let you select a layout for Blender for each focus. There is one for sculpting.
  • The upper right has a lot of icons that let you move around the program (solid, see-thru, etc., and perspective. You would have to know this stuff.
  • This video is for you right now if you don’t know anything, and for him in a couple of years: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOmYInaX-wE
• Have him search Wikipedia on something he loves and to look for the sources.
• Have him look for, speed up if necessary, and learn from youtube tutorials on topics that interest him.

Side note: Affinity (photoshop alternative) just became free, but I think that’s too much. Good to know about though.

This is the only good news from trump’s term. The waltons losing money in this way exposes who they are, and might piss them off enough to do something.

He’s a young Bernie Sanders and they’re very afraid.

Republicans are shitting their pants right now.

I feel bad for the sandwich guy, but that video is hilarious. The editor thinks they’re a 90’s great film maker. It’s a sandwich guy, not a 911 attacker.

Why is there an FBI guy there? Also, masks off when arresting, very weird.

Doesn’t mastodon have that? You type in a keyword and then you add it as a “user.”

The picture of this happening just as trump announced something he wanted to announce, is hilarious.

No need for tin foil hats, it’s really bad in those files.

“A few GOP house members say they’ve heard from FBI/DOJ contacts that the Epstein files (with copies in different agencies) are worse than Michael Wolff’s description of Epstein photos showing Trump with half naked teenage girls,” Shuster wrote.

That comment points to an earlier interview with Trump biographer Michael Wolff, who told the Daily Beast in October that he had personally seen “about a dozen Polaroid snapshots” of Trump and Epstein. Wolff said the photos showed Trump with “several topless young women on his lap,” and that Epstein “pulled the photos out of a safe and spread them out like a deck of cards” while Wolff was visiting. According to the author, Epstein wanted him to write a book about his life.

If that sounds incriminating, Shuster’s report suggests the DOJ’s files could be even worse.