• Enkrod@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Eh, if you leave out Fairphone the scoring range is realistic.

      And Fairphone is specifically tailored to reach the highest realistically possible ethics standards. No wonder they crush this. The downside is that their phones are quite expensive relative to phones of comparable power.

  • morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why are they including the samsung galaxy book, which is a laptop but not samsung phones, in a mobile phone comparison?

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    full score on tech sustainability for the company that removed the headphone jack at the same they they releases Bluetooth headphones while their earlier models still can’t call properly! Whoohoo

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was wondering why on earth all these brands got full marks on climate. Absolute bogus table.

  • ininewcrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Data is always beautiful if you cherry pick the data you want.

    This is like judging how beautiful someone is by only looking at their hands.

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Yeah, yeah, the Fairphone is very fair until you’re forced to use their software because they’re unable to collaborate with GrapheneOS because they leak keys, all their bootloader security is bullshit and they don’t care about making it right.

  • tibi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why the arbitrary ethiscore classification (25% for average and 60% for good? Do they just want Apple to not be red?

  • FundMECFS@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Can some investor pour 100 million or something into fairphone so the phones actually become good?

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      If it’s your average investor, they’ll want a return, which will make fair phone stop being ethical.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Other than being a bit thick, the Fairphone 5 is actually a very good phone.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes. Although I don’t know what you mean with “software comparability”.

          I am still on the stock Android it comes with, which works fine but is still infested with Google stuff. I am not sure about the state of alternative ROMs, but I think it is not bad given how relatively new the hardware is. Personally I plan to switch to PostmarketOS or Mobian once that support matures a bit, but it seems to be almost there now.

            • poVoq@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Yeah, no problems with Bluetooth and audio here. Wifi reception is probably the best I ever had on a smart-phone.

    • rollinghills@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      It takes a lot of work and time to build smartphones.

      The Pixel and the iPhone weren’t built overnight.

    • CareHare@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I bought one a couple of years ago, still use it. It’s not that bad, just don’t expect any crazy fluff. It’s the compromise one makes for a sustainable future. Cheaper than most flagships.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Cheaper than most flagships.

        Yea, because It’s not a flagship, it’s got a crap proc that even the Tensor 2 beats. The Tensor 2 proc that has been widely regarded as the worst processor.

        And 6 GB RAM on the base model? What‽ What year is this‽

        You have to really prioritize the Fairphone mission and accept all the compromises you have to make

        • cybersin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t understand why people need so much processing power in a phone?

          If you really need mobile processing power and can tolerate a larger device, even a cheap, old, shitty, crusty, used laptop would likely offer a better experience.

        • CareHare@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          prioritize the Fairphone mission

          As if 10 years ago we didn’t do just fine with phones like the fairphone 4. It’s just ridiculous to me that you mock its processor like it’s not even a functional phone.

          You won’t be more content with your life by always reaching for more. It’s a capitalistic and consumer mindset. Bound to fail in due time.

          What good is a 124 GB RAM phone when the world is uninhabitable.

          • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            What good is a 124 GB RAM phone when the world is uninhabitable.

            To play games on in your artificial environment / while you go through traffic in a new more air filtery car.

      • FundMECFS@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I get that, but as someone on a currently near 8 year old phone, I’ve been told by friends the fairphone will barely last half that long :/.

      • tibi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s a low end smartphone with mid range price and awful security. What’s not to love?

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I find it difficult to believe every chinese phone maker is evading taxes. It’s also questionable how they manged to give an employee owned company, Huawei, a 0 for company ethos.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    How is Google Pixel that low? They have good software support and support third party roms like GraphineOS better than nearly any other manufacturer.

    • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Good news, you (probably) can! Find a flagship phone you like from a year to three ago, and go buy a gently used one. Buying things used is almost always better for the environment than buying them new.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        So far I can’t find anything that fits me better than a CMF Nothing Phone.

        $240.

        Fairly powerful hardware for that price range.

        Apparently capable of running e/OS

        A shape that has actual flat, easily gripable edges, as opposed to seemingly everything else that is completely rounded.

        (I’ve got a serious wrist/hand injury to my dominant hand, and that makes this last one pretty important)

        Is there anything comparable for all or most of those features, in that price range, capable of being either de googled android, or running an open source and/or privacy oriented os?

        I’ve attempted to look for such a phone, and basically everything is either double or more the cost.

  • waigl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve been using a shiftphone for the last ~5 years. I wonder where they would land on the ranking. They should als do fairly well.