• bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m sure they probably do - shit as Walmart is a depression in consumer spending is overall bad for them.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      What are the customers going to do? Buy from someone else? Wal-Mart is already often the cheapest option around.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s already often the only option around. So many small businesses like local supermarkets and hardware stores got closed down in small towns by Walmart moving in and now there’s no alternative. I see it all over in central Indiana and Illinois.

        • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Less sales but more expensive, so same income, less costs.
          Also less regulations, so they can sell crappier and cheaper alternatives for the same price.
          Also, lower taxes on big corporations.
          And they’ll probably be able to use the private prison system to turn shoplifters into very cheap slave labour, saving on wages.

          Seems like a win-win situation for Walmart, though not so much for its customers.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Buying less, but they’ll be spending the same amount of money, barring rises in other expenses not directly related to tariffs (rent, utilities, etc). Their quality of life will simply go down. Wal-Mart doesn’t care about that. We could all be medieval peasants for all they care.