• Gamma@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Funny comparison. One is a yearly multiplayer-ish release and the other is a sequel to a 13 year old singleplayer action game. I have no doubt AW2 could sell a ton more copies… but they’ve decided they don’t want that

    • Coelacanth
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      No, they decided that Epic was the best bet to get the game done at all as they were willing to finance it, and this is the unfortunate outcome.

      • Gamma@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yep, I’m aware of why they went with Epic, but if Epic wanted to make more of a return they’d put the game on the platform with more paying users. But they decided they don’t want that

        • Coelacanth
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Sorry, I thought you were blaming Remedy and not Epic.

          • Gamma@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Fair, I wasn’t clear! I’m sure Remedy would LOVE to get the game in as many player’s hands as they could