Now if only they could more clearly communicate when games are playable offline.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      101
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Adding kernel malware after the fact should entitle every single owner who requests one to a full refund no matter how long has passed.

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’d really like Valve to take an official policy on post-release changes that break games, but for what it’s worth they have not given me any hassle with refunds in these scenarios.

        • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yup. If it’s important enough that devs now have to add a disclaimer on the store page, surely devs shouldn’t be allowed to circumvent that by adding it later. Since SteamDeck customers are affected by this the most, it’s weird that this isn’t already a rule, particularly for games that are SteamDeck verified.

      • TipRing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Full agree. I do want some kind of policy for games that introduce anti-cheat both during early access and after release. Bricking a game you paid for should offer some sort of recourse.

      • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t think that’s fair. I “own” GTA5 and don’t really care for the last… 8 years? what they add. I had the full content of my purchase. Why should I be able to gain money for this?