• Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think Windows 10 has nailed it UI/UX-wise.

      Too bad they enshittified it into oblivion.

      • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        Except for the start menu and right click menu, yeah, I’d agree. Luckily, you can bring both back if you wanted to.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It peaked somewhere between 2000 and 7. Personally, I place it in XP, but opinions vary.

      • palordrolap@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        2K was my jam.

        The death of the DOS line of Windows (3.x, 9x, ME) lead to the decision to inject clown DNA into NT in order to appeal to the masses and that’s how we ended up with XP.

        Vista was an attempt to eradicate the clown, but it was still there, people hated it and because Microsoft thought they had eradicated the clown, they thought people wanted more clown, and that’s how we ended up with Windows 8.

        What about 7? The clown gene skipped a generation.

      • dufkm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I run Debian at home because “Microsoft evil”, but I kinda think the Windows 10 image we use at work is alright. I work at a Forbes 500 company with a huuuge IT department, so I’m guessing they’ve done well at setting up group policies or something to make a de-cluttered experience for us. At least I never see any ads or Bing bullshit, and the Start menu works like I expect from ye old days. I could never make W10 work just as sleek at home, so I gave up and moved to Linux.

        That said, most developers here still use a local Linux VM for actual developing lol.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        98SE, XP, and 7 each were relatively solid for their time. They all had issues, but were far better at being an OS than what we have now or are trying to be sold to constantly upgrade to.

          • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            ME was even worse. It either worked fine or just didn’t work at all (BSODs all the time). 98SE was crap as well, but ME is the leader in that department.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          React OS is awesome, and I need it to run stable on some metal.

          And also play WoW, because I don’t trust linux to run whatever copy-protection crap is on there and not brick my account through no fault of its own.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Has there ever been a good version of Windows? Old versions were functional but terribly insecure and newer versions are reasonably secure but cloud connected ad platforms.

      Windows 10 is probably the middle ground although the newer versions come with the same anti features Windows 11 has

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Good question. I will say W7 because W10 necessitated an SSD to stay performant, so bloat and bullshit got rolled into W10

        • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          57 minutes ago

          LTSC has almost the same performance as Win7… almost. It is runnable on a regular spinning drive.

      • Ziglin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The version I’ve seen people experience the most issues with relative to the time they’ve used it.

        • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          53 minutes ago

          That’s because MS didn’t invest time and money in it after 10 came out. A lot of bugs went unfixed. But, if you fix the start menu and removed all the apps, that thing was unbeatable regarding speed. It was fairly faster than 7, even on a spinning drive.

          Best MS OS regarding speed. If they fixed the bugs, it would have been even better than 7 or 10.