Are we all just part of an endless cosmic cycle

  • Science’s best guess at how the universe came into being includes the Big Bang followed by a moment of rapid inflationary expansion.

  • However, this theory left a few mysteries and quirks in its wake, including the existence of dark matter and conundrums like “the flatness problem.”

  • A fringe theory known as non-singular matter bouncing cosmology claims to answer these issues by suggesting that the universe “bounces” between a hot big bang era and the kind of universe we see today.

Answering the question of how everything began was always going to be a difficult one, but humans have made incredible progress—especially considering that, in the cosmological blink of an eye, we’ve gone from writing on cave walls to carrying handheld computers around in our pockets.

Although an intriguing idea, the Big Bang + Inflation model of the universe is still the modern cave man’s best bet at understanding what shaped our universe. But the researchers say it should be possible to figure out if this non-singular matter bouncing cosmology holds any merit as “enhanced curvature perturbations, collapsing to primordial black holes, can induce as well a stochastic gravitational-wave background.”

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    How do these theories deal with the observation that the universe rate of expansion appears to be increasing? Wouldn’t a bounce imply that the expansion rate should decrease?

    • Coelacanth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      The expansion rate should decrease and eventually reverse at some point. I don’t think anyone has yet defined when or why, or the theory would be considered complete. But us currently being in the phase of expansion doesn’t automatically invalidate the theory I don’t think. Then again, I’m not an astrophysicist.