The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agoChaos!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square230fedilinkarrow-up1942arrow-down118
arrow-up1924arrow-down1imageChaos!lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agomessage-square230fedilink
minus-squareSaleh@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down8·edit-22 months agoSo if they were both in your name she couldn’t? I know that is not probably not what you are saying, but that is the implication of this argumentation
minus-squareMachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoNot hard to put both vehicles in both names. I don’t think they are “arguing” anything, just stating a legal fact about marital property.
So if they were both in your name she couldn’t?
I know that is not probably not what you are saying, but that is the implication of this argumentation
Not hard to put both vehicles in both names. I don’t think they are “arguing” anything, just stating a legal fact about marital property.