• lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      If they’re not getting used, nobody’s having to pay very much for them. It’s a stupid thing to worry about.

      • DrFuggles@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        hey, I agree that there should be tampons in bathrooms. It just seemed like you were misunderstanding each other, so I tried to help out. I also think that we should be able to cover the, idk, 500k per year to outfit schools with tampons.

    • KeenFlame
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      How? Like that’s saying a town should not get water because they don’t have that many residents. Every paid for tampon is for the same reason no matter where it is placed. This is just a convoluted rationalisation for discrimination

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Like that’s saying a town should not get water because they don’t have that many residents.

        More like a water company not being willing to run pipes out to service that one house up the hollow past where the state stops bothering to pave the road. And you know what? Water utilities don’t run those pipes, because it would cost a bunch of money for very little public benefit. You don’t have to get too rural before you start seeing people with well or spring water because it stops being worth it to run city water.

        • KeenFlame
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          No, they already have the pipe and try to remove them

          You do see the difference