not that i give a fuck about this dead CEO (lol) but were these things really her unilateral decision? or was it the inevitable consequence of the pursuit of profit in a privately owned company which would have happened regardless of which bourgeois cretin happened to be CEO?
It’s always a little bit of both. Some of the general exists in the specific and some of the specific exists in the general. She enacts her class’ will in the ways she is capable of and in the manner that she sees fit, which gives her moral responsibility, while still making her a replaceable part in an enormous machine.
as someone whose dysfunctional workplace makes harebrained decisions… the CEO absolutely does sanction almost every stupid choice made and also makes a plethora of stupid decisions all by himself
not that i give a fuck about this dead CEO (lol) but were these things really her unilateral decision? or was it the inevitable consequence of the pursuit of profit in a privately owned company which would have happened regardless of which bourgeois cretin happened to be CEO?
It’s always a little bit of both. Some of the general exists in the specific and some of the specific exists in the general. She enacts her class’ will in the ways she is capable of and in the manner that she sees fit, which gives her moral responsibility, while still making her a replaceable part in an enormous machine.
dialectical
as someone whose dysfunctional workplace makes harebrained decisions… the CEO absolutely does sanction almost every stupid choice made and also makes a plethora of stupid decisions all by himself