• ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      I know what subnetting is for. That’s why I know which RFC range to use. I’m talking based on the number of devices and needed groupings, 172 is a good sweet spot where 198.x would be a bit tight and 10.x is complete overkill.

      • Farid@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Could you please explain, how 172.x is different “size” than 10.x? Don’t both of those have 255255255 spaces?

        • ramble81@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Yeah. Here’s a breakdown of the allocations and their sizes:

          • 192.168.0.0/16 - 65,536 addresses
          • 172.16.0.0/12 - 1,048,576 addresses
          • 10.0.0.0/8 - 16,777,216 addresses

          Most home applications only need a single /24 (256 addresses) so they are perfectly fine with 192.168.0.0/24, but as you get larger businesses, you don’t use every single address but instead break it out by function so it’s easier to know what is what and to provide growth in each area.

          • Farid@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            But tbh, I still don’t see why you can’t just use 10.x but only as many subnets as you need.

            I know jack shit about networking, but I’ve set up OpenWrt routers a couple of times, and set my home network to 10.99. because that was suggested by a ZeroTier tutorial and I thought that’s cool.

            • ramble81@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              You’re technically correct, you can use any of them. It’s honestly just a matter of preference.