You’re making fun of the people who use those ridiculous statements as arguments, right?
You’re making fun of the people who use those ridiculous statements as arguments, right?
> reads a serious comment
> my brain:
– He-he, “Putin them on blast”.
If I had one I’d name it Paul. Or Wanker.
Yeah, but that’s not very typical, I’d like to make that point.
Loose seal! Loose seal!
Lemmy is not internet. It has been towed outside the environment.
I mean, that requirement is kind of implied.
Only if you’re “good looking”.
A bunch of blåhajs are being piled on a bed, accompanied by Half Life 2 noises for comedic effect.
Isn’t it a toupee? Which keeps flying off.
Besides, being bald is more manly.
Mine’s screen popped out due to the battery swelling :(
That’s one expensive joke…
It’s not even subtle, House literally lives at 221B Baker Street.
Yep, that’s them. Had a long-ass thread with them where they wouldn’t engage with any of my arguments about why Ukrainians aren’t Nazis and instead tried to attack me directly. But can’t tell for sure if they are a tankie, vatnik, or just a troll.
That’s a Chevrolet, in case you were serious.
How are they paying their electricity bill?
Thank you very much for your response (and the invitation)! Although I’m still left wondering about the purpose of listing the subjective case. Your approach makes more sense, “you can use these” and list several options. But why do people list, for example “she/her”? Everybody knows what the subjective case of “she” is.
To be fair, Kyiv is huge.
And you are on Lemmy, which means you don’t go out very often. (/j)