• eRac@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Pretty much all of the environment is CG, which makes nearly every shot a VFX shot automatically. Additionally, almost all shots of a vehicle in motion where the actors are acting was shot still and all motion is CG.

      Practical and CG are not mutually exclusive.

      • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think this disagreement boils down to which elements are CGI.

        Of course there are many background elements that are CGI in Fury Road, therefore most scenes do contain CGI. However, all the primary elements of the scenes (vehicles and characters/costumes) are generally practical. That doesn’t appear to be the case with Furiosa. The most important stuff appears to be CGI in many cases.

    • TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      You just have to look at the credits to see the army of people who worked on VFX for fury Road. I dont have time to dig up exact sources, but this guy touches on it at one point in this series:

      No CGI is just invisible CGI

      • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ok. When people are saying “No CGI” they mean that the movie was shot on location using practical stunts instead of filming in a green screen dome like the MCU and Star Wars trash that Disney is pumping out. There can be an army of VFX artists in the credits, but who enhanced the films effects instead of rendering entire scenes.

        The first Furiosa trailer that dropped like 6 months to a year ago gave off that green screen MCU vibe. I don’t think anyone really means absolutely zero post-production when they say “No CGI”.

        • TheFonz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I understand why people are focusing on green screen as stand in for CGI (I’m sure we still have collective ptsd from the Star Wars prequels) but there is a lot more to CGI in production that goes beyond “enhancing” the scenes. Entire elements (ie vehicles) are CGI in Fury Road.

          • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Again, everything I have read and seen regarding the effects for Fury Road was that pretty much everything was filmed practically and on location, including the vehicular combat etc. If you’re referring to a vehicle getting sucked up into the air by the dust storm, ok bro. If your talking about a vehicle driving around in the desert, once again you’re going to have to cite that claim with something other than “VFX artists are in the credits” because it flies in the face of ten years of commentary on this movie.

            • TheFonz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              You’re kinda missing the point and I don’t know if I’m doing a poor job of explaining or what. I never said there were no practical effects. I never said they weren’t the majority of the effects. I never said they filmed on a green screen most of the scenes. All that being told, there is a mountain of VFX happening in almost every shot. And to ignore it is silly at this point.

              • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                The issue that started this whole thing was the concern over what looked to be an over reliance on CGI based on the original Furiosa trailer, especially considering that what made Fury Road so special was its heavy use of practical effects for the vast majority of its stunt work and its use of CGI to enhance rather than create. No one was saying CGI and VFX aren’t done in post.

                I don’t think i’m missing the point. I think we’re both talking past each other a bit and you’re being a bit too pedantic which is shifting the conversation away from its original context.

                • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  No, people are seeing a trailer that was released long before production is wrapped and they’re freaking out. Which is normal, but once the movie is out I promise The same people won’t tell the difference between what is practical or not.