If a machine is never 100% efficient transforming energy into work because part of the energy is converted into heat, does it mean an electric heater is 100% efficient? @showerthoughts@lemmy.world

  • lad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    The visible part of the spectrum is likely going to be absorbed somewhere far away from the place you’re trying to heat up. Also, I’m not educated enough to tell if there will be further losses of energy

    • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      If it’s in a room the visible radiation will still just heat up the room. If you’re using it outdoors and point it away then yeah you’ll have some waste.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not sure if visible radiation that leaves through a transparent window will still heat up only inside the room, that what I meant. Probably should have phrased it better

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      that’s only true if you shine it out a very large the window

      normally windows cover a quite small fraction of a rooms surface area

      but sure, if a few fractions of a percent leave through a window, i guess its technically not a 100% effective space heater, if we define the work as heating only the relevant room.