X CEO Linda Yaccarino stepped in to remove a pro-Hitler post::X CEO Linda Yaccarino helped get a viral pro-Hitler tweet taken down, The Information reported. Hate speech has risen on X since Elon Musk’s takeover.

    • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does anyone else feel like saying Elon is worse than Hitler would be more acceptable than saying Hitler was better than Elon? It strikes me as odd because they are essentially the same statement but they just hit so differently.

      • theherk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right. The connotation is different. “X is better than Y”, is generally implying “Y is good but X is even better”. “X is worse than Y” would be “Y is bad but X is even worse”.

    • ram@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      It included a photo of Hitler with the caption, “At least now the world know, why he did, what he did.”

  • wildcardology@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I didn’t read the article but they need the CEO to remove a pro-Hitler post? Nobody else can do it?

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, it shouldn’t take a C-suite level decision to remove content praising Hitler and the Holocaust. The fact that it does suggests there is major disfunction in X/Twitter’s approach to content moderation, which the article hints at but doesn’t really explain.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a PR blunder. “Our content moderation is so broken the CEO had directly intervene to remove a post praising the Holocaust” isn’t a great message.

    • alienanimals@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s PR for Musk and his businesses every single day. Idiots continue to upvote it even when it’s non-news like this.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sure that tweet was also providing location of Elon’s jet, so it is justified.

  • sugarfree@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The post in question appeared on the X page belonging to Afnan Ullah Khan, a member of the Senate in Pakistan, The Jerusalem Post reported. It included a photo of Hitler with the caption, “At least now the world know, why he did, what he did.”

    Great voters and politicians over in Pakistan.

    • Fisk400
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every country has a portion of loons in the Senate.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Ever since the Israel-Hamas conflict began last month, misinformation has been running rampant on social media, with X being one of the main forums.

    One expert previously told Insider that Elon Musk is to blame for the proliferation of misinformation on X due to the changes he made.

    One of these changes included a major cut to X’s trust and safety team, from 230 to 20 people, as reported by Insider’s Kali Hays.

    In the week following Elon Musk’s takeover, the Center for Countering Hate found that antisemitic slurs were posted at a 22% higher rate.

    The day before the tweet, in an October 27 blog post, Yaccarino asserted that safety is a “critical priority” for the X team.

    She also said the team is still working to “combat bad actors and consistently enforce our rules in areas such as hate speech, platform manipulation, child safety, impersonation, civic integrity, and more.”


    The original article contains 515 words, the summary contains 151 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!