realitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 8 months agobut idk tholemmy.worldimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1987arrow-down115
arrow-up1972arrow-down1imagebut idk tholemmy.worldrealitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-square0ops@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·8 months agoWell only if “theoretically” is followed by a statement compatible with supported theory. Too many people confuse theory with hypothesis
minus-squareYAMAPIKARIYA@lemmyfi.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·8 months agoYou can easily get away with using “Theoretically” in every situation, hypothetically speaking.
minus-squareALostInquirer@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 months agoWhere might hyporetically fall into this? Hyporetically speaking, for the real theothetists that might press the matter.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 months agoLet’s do a thought experiment on this hypothetical.
minus-squaretetris11@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-28 months agoTheoretically, I had underetood the opposite.
Well only if “theoretically” is followed by a statement compatible with supported theory. Too many people confuse theory with hypothesis
You can easily get away with using “Theoretically” in every situation, hypothetically speaking.
Where might hyporetically fall into this? Hyporetically speaking, for the real theothetists that might press the matter.
Let’s do a thought experiment on this hypothetical.
Theoretically, I had underetood the opposite.