sorry i got my rhetoric ™️ wrong last time i am just attempting to illustrate the thesis of Tolerance is not a moral precept by Yonatan Zunger so check that out if ur curious thanks babes <3

[Tolerance] is an agreement to live in peace, not an agreement to be peaceful no matter the conduct of others. A peace treaty is not a suicide pact.

  • Now hold on. Nobody said not tolerating meant suppressing. It means opposing.

    That… that’s bigot rhetoric, and is full circle to the issue here. “You can’t call me out for using the N word because MAH FREE SPEACH”

    I agree with you about free speech – and I would also argue that it extends to forums wanting freedom to choose what they contain.

    There’s always other forums. Private forums controlling their content isn’t silencing. That’s not how it works.

      • You’re trying to tie a different issue to the discussion here and it’s simply non sequitur.

        We’re not talking about restricting speech at a legal level, we’re talking about opposing bad speech with good speech or by cultivating private fora where good speech is encouraged and bad speech discouraged.

        You literally jumped down the pitfall of the rhetoric of the bigoted folks that I alluded to. Excellent aim, wrong target.