• Sylvartas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The bad is starting to look more and more like an impending global societal collapse with every passing day though

    • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah I don’t know about “par for the course”

      What other generation had the threat of scientifically proven ecological collapse looming over them?

      • ozebb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        9 months ago

        scientifically proven ecological collapse

        This is a pretty specific thing, but the general “we’re all doomed” vibe is definitely not unique to today. Boomers and older had the threat of nuclear annihilation looming over them, and before that… well, disease and famine and death and destruction due to war have historically been the norm.

        Imagine how you’d feel living in the Americas in the 16th or 17th centuries and either watching the destruction wrought by European settlers firsthand or, maybe worse, watching your peers die en masse of the diseases introduced by those settlers. Imagine living in Eurasia in the 13th century and watching the Mongol army sweep through.

        None of this is to say that today’s challenges aren’t real and serious. Just that we’re not the first to face such challenges.

        • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I think the doom is real, but we’re all looking at it through 6" x 3" magnifying glasses that condense all the shit into one giant nugget, and then the easy thing is to comment on that nugget because, well it’s right there, and last winter was unseasonably warm and there were some pretty catastrophic wildfires, and the ocean is doing weird shit, and it’s easy to think that that’s all there is, but you can still take a walk in the woods on a sunny day, and say hi to some people, and maybe make a friend.

          • Naatan@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            By your logic, the first humans should’ve stopped having kids and died out the first time they faced any sort of existential issue. Life’s hard yo, that doesn’t mean it’s not worth living.

            • GreenMario@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              It really isn’t worth living.

              No matter how easy, hard, successful or failure of a life you live, the end result is identical.

              • Naatan@lemdro.id
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                That’s life. What value you assign it is up to you to decide. Philosophy is how I find my value, for others it’s religion. Ultimately, that’s something you have to figure out for yourself.

                • GreenMario@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I get to remember that ending.

                  But go ahead and have kids so you can watch em slave for wage massa, Pay 10 grand a month to rent a Pod, and deal with 150°F winters yeah boiiii life is sooo goOoOd!!!

                  Fuck outta here, sadist.

      • HardNut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Considering science has only gotten robust enough to prove anything like that far more recently than any good examples of ecological collapse, I’d say this parameter is a little arbitrary.

        The best example I can think of regarding ecological collapse is during and after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. Their climate decreased in temperature, which reduces crop yields, which weakened the empire and encouraged migration from northern Europe, which brought their collapse (plus like 12 other things lol).

        In 535AD, during Justinian’s reign in the east, the first black plague happened following a supermassive volcano that left the sky covered in ash blocking the sun. This was a massively ecologically damaging period of history and it caused the death of countless plant and animal life, along with the deaths of half the population of the Mediterranean.

        It’s not like people of this age were taking soil samples and references trends or whatever, but they certainly understood how things were going poorly.

      • saigot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The ozone layer depletion was a very serious threat. The solutions were a lot easier though.

        • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          At least for me, that was ongoing when I was in elementary school, so I’d still count that as part of “this generation”

          Gen Z and younger at least got to not have to worry about that though, you’re right

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean, they literally thought WW1 and WW2 would start the apocalypse.

      Nuclear armageddon was a daily fear of the Cold War, and almost happened several times.

      The difference now is that we know all we need to do to ruin Earth for human life is to do nothing.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is an interesting perspective, because in previous generations most of the long term fears were settled by simply doing nothing. They held their breath and it worked out.

        The key difference is that the current generations are acutely aware that if we do nothing and just “stay calm and carry on”, we’re totally fucked. Inaction isn’t going to save us this time. We can’t put our heads in the sand and just sing ourselves to sleep then expect a good outcome when we resurface.

        I think that’s a key differentiator. Previous generations were fearful of something happening. Current generations are fearful of nothing happening, because if nothing happens then the world will become uninhabitable by humans.

        Yet, the majority of the decision-makers in our society are silent generation/boomers that drove to success by inaction and they’re largely doing nothing. We see this and understandably know how fucked we are.

        • vivadanang@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          Inaction isn’t going to save us this time.

          It won’t, but it will sustain profits, and that’s what terrifies me: we’re gonna watch the world burn so some rich bastards get an even better return instead of doing something to save our species. sorry about your future kids, profit margins and people wanting to roll coal seemed more important at the time.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah I think that nails it. That fear of nothing changing except the slow crumble getting worse while we watch more people metaphorically drown in the onslaught of horrors.

    • Naatan@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      You need to give articles making predictions about the future a heavy amount of doubt. We may be relatively intelligent as a species, but I genuinely think we way over-estimate our abilities. Predicting the future is hard. The biggest problem is that predictions are based on past data, and cannot account for what might happen that hasn’t happened before. Which when faced with a brand new problem tends to be a brand new response.

      Look at our lives right now. While certainly not ideal (who could make that claim, in all history?) it’s pretty damn nice if you look back in time. Yes lotsa awful stuff MIGHT happen, but that’s always been true. And compared to the challenges of the past it’s not on any scale we haven’t been on before (I mean the Cold War literally could have resulted in the planet becoming uninhabitable due to nukes).

      I’m not saying I disagree with you, I’m merely trying to give it a glass half full perspective. I agree some scale of societal collapse does seem like it is a real possibility, but it’s by no means guaranteed or necessarily even likely. We don’t know what we don’t know. Embrace not knowing what the future holds and just enjoy life for what it is today.

      • Taniwha420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is what gave me some peace: it could all end horribly for me at any minute. Anything could happen. I could get hit by a bus. I could die painfully from some fucked up disease. A fat asteroid could hit the earth. It’s all out of my control. Or things could turn out for the better, by some way I never foresaw. The best thing for us to do is to strive to be good people and care for what is in front of us.

        I still find it a bit of a mindfuck that humanity is being such a deleterious effect on this beautiful world.

        … and I do think that growing up under the threat of nuclear holocaust must have been similarly terrifying.