• TechyDad@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    And you’re missing that, without the free meals being available to everyone, there’s a negative social stigma to getting the free school lunches. Kids skip the meals because they don’t want to be seen as “that poor kid.” This leads to them going hungry, not doing well in school, and not having as many chances to break the cycle of poverty.

    By opening the free school lunches to everyone, the stigma is removed. If Billy gets a free school lunch, he might be poor or his parents just might be having him get the school lunches instead of packing something. Without the social stigma, kids who need the lunches are more likely to get them and more kids are fed.

    • Mummelpuffin@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Aight, cool, but that doesn’t change that this comment section is operation on the assumption that you’re dealing with people who understand that and literally enjoy making children starve. This sort of characterization is rampant in politics and a total anathema to actual discussion or ever getting anything done.

      • TechyDad@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Given that other Republican proposals involve keeping child marriage legal and opening child labor laws back up so that kids can work dangerous jobs without the companies involved being liable for their safety, it’s not a huge leap from “Republicans want to cut free school meals” to “Republicans want kids to starve.”

        Maybe it’s a not a 100% real leap, but it’s one that the Republicans have set themselves up for.