𝙣𝙪𝙠𝙚@yah.lol to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agoI have something important to sayfiles.catbox.moevideomessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up190arrow-down13
arrow-up187arrow-down1videoI have something important to sayfiles.catbox.moe𝙣𝙪𝙠𝙚@yah.lol to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squareSemi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 year agoThe nunchuck is based on the flail, which is an agricultural tool and therefore can be carried with plausible deniability, or might be more readily available than a stick of sufficient heft.
minus-squareFisk400linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·1 year agoIs walking around with a agricultural tool while not near said agriculture more plausible than using a walking stick while walking?
minus-squareSemi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 year agoThat depends, are you a rice farmer in medieval Japan?
minus-squarepeopleproblems@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agowait how is a flail an agricultural tool?
minus-squareSemi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up17·1 year agoIt was used to thresh grain in pre-industrial agriculture
The nunchuck is based on the flail, which is an agricultural tool and therefore can be carried with plausible deniability, or might be more readily available than a stick of sufficient heft.
Is walking around with a agricultural tool while not near said agriculture more plausible than using a walking stick while walking?
That depends, are you a rice farmer in medieval Japan?
wait
how is a flail an agricultural tool?
It was used to thresh grain in pre-industrial agriculture