But people were bad at assessing whether images were made by artificial intelligence or an artist.

  • KeenFlame
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    No you did not and have a very limited view of what generative art is.

    Do you realise that in the eighties when the first generative artists arrived it was without this knee jerk shit, and studied just as much as the other art

    In whatever case you may not decide what is art and not, nor pretend that it only seems sudden. It is sudden. Hatred for no good reason, just because it’s popular opinion. It will very soon feel really foolish to have such a stance because some of the big companies are disrespectful. It is just an art form. Nothing worth hate about it

    • xor@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      yeah, you’re not making art if you tell AI to draw you a pretty picture… neither is the ai…
      get over it

      • KeenFlame
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Anything someone calls art is art. If they only shit, it’s art. It’s important you understand this.

        It’s valid for you to say “I don’t care for AI art and think it’s cheap” which, I also agree with, however, what you are engaged in is harmful aggressive rhetoric.

        And no. Generative art is not telling ai to draw. You are delusional and blinded by rage.

        Stop being a child, as soon as possible.

        • xor@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          ok, your mom is art then…

          Anything someone calls art is art.

          and you’re extremely wrong to say it’s not " valid" to say that…