• 0 Posts
  • 62 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 11th, 2023

help-circle









  • That shit kills me. I was reading something on hexbear about some recent anti-gay stuff in Russia. It was all about critical support, and not just Russia. They also talked about critical support for Nigeria, despite them having the death penalty for gay people, because they’re “anti-imperialist.”

    Why doesn’t it go the other way? Why can’t you give “critical support” to countries making strides in human rights while criticizing their economic policy?

    To me, their priorities seem pretty fucked up. Between exploitative economic policy and killing or imprisoning people for existing as themselves, I know which one I’m going to be “critical” of and which one will cause me to refuse support for a country in any way.






  • roscoe@startrek.websitetoRisa@startrek.websiteBait
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The thing I love about this, the thing I always find funny whenever this comes up, is that these midwits are just too dumb to make the obvious argument. The argument that is “in their face” and “being shoved down their throats.”

    There is a rational, coherent argument to make their point. It’s one I disagree with. It’s one that, in my opinion, can only be made in bad faith with no purpose other than to be a concern troll, but it’s there.

    They always bring up Adira, Gray, Jett, Stamets, Culber, and anything else that’s gone up their ass but never any of the actual social commentary because they’re so thick it went over their heads and they didn’t even notice it. You can see it in this thread. They mention the characters and people respond with “but they’re just existing, how does that bother you?” They just bring up the characters again to a response of “yeah, we heard you the first time, what are they doing that bothers you other than existing?” And it just goes in a circle.

    There was never an episode of ToS where Uhura talked about how hard it was to be a black woman as a bridge officer, because it wasn’t. That’s the whole point. In the future Star Trek wants us to imagine, a black female officer is completely unremarkable. Whenever they wanted to engage in social commentary about race relations in the 60s they had to invent an allegorical race, time travel, or use some other device to make their point.

    The same thing is happening in the newer series. All those characters are just existing. Their sexuality and gender identity is completely unremarkable in the future Star Trek shows us. If those dipshits had two brain cells to rub together they would see the new series are full of allegories about not just tolerance, or even acceptance, but appreciation for beings with non-conforming expressions of self. If any of that did manage to trickle through their thick skulls they probably just twisted it into “yeah, people shouldn’t make fun of me for having a relationship with a waifu pillow.”

    If they weren’t so stupid they could easily give a half dozen examples and say “it’s too much,” “I got it the first time,” “focus on something else for a change,” or whatever other bullshit justification they came up with to oppose these themes. It would be a bad faith argument that I would disagree with but at least they could pretend they’re not bigots, instead of their current position which seems to be “I’ve got no problem with these people, I just don’t want to see them.”


  • roscoe@startrek.websitetoRisa@startrek.websiteBait
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I saw Starship Troopers shortly after it came out. Other than knowing his name and that he was a well known sci-fi author, I wasn’t familiar with Heinlein so I assumed he was a satirist. I picked up one of his other books and read half of it thinking I just wasn’t getting it before I suddenly realized “oh shit, this guy is being sincere.”


  • roscoe@startrek.websitetoRisa@startrek.websiteBait
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Saying something happened is not an example.

    Which episode has “a 2020 style pronoun talk?”

    Which episode has a plot involving Stamets and Culber that wouldn’t be essentially unchanged if it was a heterosexual relationship?

    I will go rewatch them now and come back and apologize if these things actually exist.


  • roscoe@startrek.websitetoRisa@startrek.websiteBait
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    No one is asking you for an apology, just an example.

    Surely you can do that, right? This thing that’s so pervasive it’s ruined entire seasons for you, you must be able to remember one scene from one episode where it actually happens.


  • roscoe@startrek.websitetoRisa@startrek.websiteBait
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    No, you made a claim. A claim that, so far, is unsupported.

    I’m simply asking for one scene, outside of your own mind, where these things actually happened.

    I only watched it once. I could be wrong. Please refresh my memory.