• 18 Posts
  • 1.24K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 19th, 2023

help-circle


  • qyron@sopuli.xyztoGreentext@sh.itjust.worksAnon misses some signals
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    And I was countering your reply.

    So you try, you get turned down. Does it hurt? Yes. Is it the end of the world? If anyone replies with “yes” that is a serious issue because it is not.

    Getting a “no” for an answer is almost guaranteed. What is there to lose? Perhaps the lost “yes” for not trying.



  • qyron@sopuli.xyztoGreentext@sh.itjust.worksAnon misses some signals
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Bullshit.

    It’s a social - stupid - standing that states romantic/social/sexual advances must be started by the male part, which automatically relegates the female part to a passive/subdued part.

    If you want someone, be bold. Doesn’t matter how you define yourself either.

    I don’t really care if you are shy and can’t speak or any coping mechanism you may have built to justify your awkwardess. Just try.

    Write a note. Have a mutual friend act as a liaison to help the first step. Write a letter. Blurt out the most incoherent speech you can muster. Then say it all again, only ten times slower. Send smoke signals. Use a parrot or a crow. But try.

    It hurts a lot more to punish yourself for not trying, later in your life. Failure and rejection are part of it. Get used to it. Learn from it.











  • Tell me what you think of this, then.

    In my country, an landlord owner can not forbid pets in a house unless there are specific rules that completely prevents it (like an HOA imposition, where no animals at all are allowed in an apartment building); it was ruled by our Supreme Court having a pet is an unwaivable right the individual has.

    (Yes, most people ignore this and just outright ban animals.)

    However, the owner of a house can demand certain conditions to be fullfilled, in order for an animal to be housed there, like the animal being registered (ID chip), licensed (paid annually), vaccinated, properly kept (cages, terrariums or whatever necessary to accomodate, safely, the animal(s)), behaviour (a dog can not spend their time barking their head off, a cat yowlling, birds screeching) and for the guardian to assume full responsability for any and all damages the animal causes.

    This part is legal and most people would run for the hills if they found such a clause on a leasing agreement, as for the moment they sign it, they are legally binded by it and failling to observe any condition is legal ground for breach of contract.


  • Human milk banks exist, as the concept of wet nurses, so sharing milk is not a novelty concept.

    Humans also retain the capability to digest milk throughout their entire lives (yes, exceptions apply), so the problem of biological use is already solved as well.

    The last barrier may be on the level of actualling producing it, perhaps?

    Unlike animals, humans can actively consent on having their milk harvested for consumption by others.

    So, the only hurdle to really solve is perhaps the resistance or taboo of human milk being like any other milk, if not even fairer.




  • Connery was a good actor but I think he got stuck to the role of the secret agent/military man/though guy, although I enjoyed his performance in Finding Forrester.

    Lazenby was the forgotten Bond, right? I agree. He had a presence but I think he was badly received after the Connery era as his Bond was more mild mannered. When Roger Moore took the character and broke off the previous mold, it simply erased the previous Bond and started the fan theory that Bond was a codename and not an individual.