![](https://feddit.nu/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.world%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F92707e22-8490-46a1-99e2-986690625260.jpeg)
![](https://feddit.nu/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffry.gs%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fc6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
My thoughts exactly.
Marketer. Photographer. Husband & dad. Lego, Minecraft, & Preds hockey fan. Movie buff, but pls #NoSpoilers!
Also @pwnicholson@mastodon.online Also @pwnicholson@pixelfed.social Also @pwnicholson.bsky.social Used to be @pwnicholson on IG, FB, TW, etc
My thoughts exactly.
The MPAA rating system didn’t start widespread use until the early 1970s, and even then (as you’d expect since since it is the MPA"A") only in the USA. Other rating systems in other countries followed later (for the most part).
So any movie prior to that would have been unrated when it came out. Especially if it was a non-USA production.
Any rating you see on a movie older than that has been applied after the fact.
Does “Jaws” count? It wouldn’t be PG these days but I’d say it counts as horror.
“The Birds” was technically unrated when it came out. I’ve seen it rated as PG-13 now, but not sure what that’s based on since it is from way before PG-13.
Horrible way to display this.
In states with no income taxes and mostly regressive taxes like sales taxes and other consumption tax, the rich with large income (who always disproportionately account for all income in any state) pay a very low share of their income in taxes. Some people will be paying 10% of their income in taxes because their entire income is spent every month and taxed as consumption (sales taxes). While others pay only 2% of their income in taxes because a good portion of their income goes into savings and tax-free retirement accounts and not on consumption.
Meanwhile states with a progressive income tax ensure that (closer to) everyone pays a more fair share of their income. So the rich end up paying more of their income. While lower income families pay a lower sales tax rate (and/or are able to see the benefits of better social programs funded by the taxes on the wealthy)
Yes. Pull up Google maps and say you want to do some theoretical trip in the future. It’ll show you different average traffic & time for the route for whatever time you pick. So you can check your possible future commute, etc
12 of the first 28 Presidents of the USA (which is the time Fitzgerald was doing his thing) had Irish heritage. 3 of them were first generation Irish (parents born in Ireland). Most of the police force of NYC was stereotyped as being all Irish by this point.
Yes, there were areas and times they were disadvantaged, but don’t even compare it to women and non-whites at the time.
…If you were white, male, and probably reasonably affluent.
I initially read that as “Florida scrambles to get retired teachers to return to combat.”
Which isn’t really wrong either.
Hopefully this isn’t too pedantic, but it shouldn’t say “first name” on any of these. It should say “given name” or “personal name”.
The entire point of the map is that it isn’t the first name for some cultures.
Every decade after the 1920s has been special for cinema for the generation that treasured it.
I wonder if this has anything to do with ThePosterDB going down recently
Their claims are based largely on building artificial islands which extends their 200 miles from the coast claims (by aging more coast). This US claim isn’t extending coast (so no control of the water column or surface), only continental shelf and mining rights
“Ewoks Caravan of Courage”? “Star Wars Holiday Special”?
You can say it’s all fun. You can even say you like it all.
I even like the sequel trilogy over the prequels (because I’m of a certain age).
But not sure about “all” Star Wars being “great”.
That’s awesome. Bookmarked!
“Beatles” is spelled correctly? It’s a horribly cheesy “Beetles but it’s music… get it?”
Awesome band. The name was always pretty silly
I think that’s the basic premise of the Star Trek hypospray. Pressure pushing in medicine rather than a needle.
Hahaha. Have fun with that.
-signed, Predators fans
Exactly. Early Marvel was deeply about character and their depth and character flaws that made them interesting. Thor, Steve Rogers, Natasha Romanov, and especially Tony Stark were interesting and complex personalities. (Bruce Banner and Clint Barton…eh).
The stories in recent Marvel products are fine. Mildly interesting serials. Ok popcorn fare.
But the character development has been getting more and more lacking. Even Thor has been reduced to ‘dumb blonde’/‘dumb entitled rich kid’ gags.
I think that’s part of what makes Loki one of the only really interesting outings for Marvel recently. He stayed reasonably conflicted and complex.
That used to be really common. Movie novelizations would come out before the movie, along with soundtracks, etc. It was part of the promotional campaign.