Me, who lives in privilege but isn’t closing their eyes and ears in deliberate ignorance: “You should try thinking about others too sometimes”

Is it not extremist to burn the world down for your 100th yatch, 700th second vacation estate, 4000th impluse buy car, 3rd private jet?

Is it easy to prove it works?

It doesn’t take much to feed children. But i guess giving lunch to kids denies you joy of seeimg them starve?

GS diversifying and playing both sides? Just a hunch. G7 has the west… whereas one could argue that the BRICS might evolve into an eastern bloc.

It’s always the same story. A group/country/institution rises to popularity for being extremely careful and well-prepared. Then people on the outside want to be let in on the action. Then the people behind this rise move on/retire/kicked out because the new people actually don’t understand patience and diligence, preparedness were the reason for the original success. They dismiss it as “red-tape” or “waste of money”, “who needs so many regulations anyway?”. They want shortcuts to success. Result: Firestation burns down.

Not everything in life is about making money you know? Everybody will have a better time if we dialed the greed down from 11.

This is a bullshit argument. People will make do with what they have. Do you think People suddenly woke up one day and demanded soft drinks to be created?

Eh? What’s this bold assumption that people would like this “feature” if fedora introduced it?

Can you find one vote which republicans voted for people?

So far you have said nothing to answer the question.

Within the context of this bill, how else can one explain all the NO votes purely from Republicans? What about republicans whose states are devastated by Hurricane Helene?

Nice try. But no.

I bet that the amount of singular bills getting passed through both the house and senate that has spent money on helping common citizens is close to nil in the past decade.

There is no scenario in which what you describe is the reasoning for the bill getting voted against, especially by republicans.

You’re reasoning feels like gymnastics to make republicans look good as you don’t have an easy argument to make.

Actually you don’t need to. Mumbai is so expensive that the phrase “1st world prices for 3rd world conditions” applies.

The evidence has been given to you in the form of links to youtube videos. You refusing to click through isn’t lack of evidence.

Here’s why:

Boards of directors are CEOs of other companies that are buddies of the CEO of the company they are directors of. This is like a shitty musical chair of board of directors.

Removed by mod

Funny choice of Mumbai that tickled me… though can’t pinpoint why.

It’s not quite equivalent right? Using an existing plant is cheaper and faster than building a new one?

Its like saying a datacenter is not financially viable only because top brass decided to use a perfectly good existing one.

You’re not on the level of wealth this thread is about so you have nothing to worry about. Besides, your income is already taxed and in some countries it is deducted by the employer before you ever see your salary.