- 1 Post
- 18 Comments
I mean you’re not wrong but I’d argue you can get more interesting cve’s using a higher more performant language such as c++. Where there are are ways to include CVE 's from C and introduce new ones to each level of your program using inheritance.
17·7 months agoSimpsons did it already…
But really look at project Westford created a bit of stink
7·8 months agoBeen ages since I had to recompile a Linux kernel to deal with hard real time (via RTAI) but I recall emc2 being a great alternative to all the fussing around recompiling as some one did all the work for that.
I also recall using this resource . Eventually I just made a class for the threads I was using to wrap POSIX and RTAI calls for periodic tasks and chose which was the underlying method on a compiler flag. If I was on my desktop I could proof of concept most things in POSIX and then test on the RTAI machine. If I need to revisit this again I may dust off my old class and add freeRTOS stuff to it so I can prototype on Linux then try to squeeze it on to an esp32.
101·8 months agoThat’s sad considering their shuttle could basically land itself. I guess those engineers were on the Ukrainian side
Now I want that version of Hamilton! Quick get Lin-Manuel Miranda I need some catchy tune about the bridge where Hamilton figured it all out.
But who is the villain his kid asking if he figured out how to multiply vectors ( been a while since I read the story about this )
Rule 1 cats are dicks
But honestly this is going to be one of those stories you will tell a out yuki for years to come enjoy the shear chaos kittens bring to the world.
Yuki probably doesn’t even care now she’s dry but even if it stuck with her it won’t stop her from causing further trouble and that’s aok.
If you are feeling silly sit down and watch some cat grooming videos with Yuki to inform her that there is a proper way to have a shower
Something like https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SBO3hBl25I8 Or https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NYN5Huto4iI
Enjoy your time with the little Devil
Umm I hate to point this out but Canada has never operated F-16s. Perhaps some wire got crossed here and they ment F-18s ( Canadians operate a variant of those) or perhaps they mean training in the training plan where they train new pilots In Harvard2s and hawks to prepare for first flights in the f16.
17·10 months agoYea this guy is the hero of the thread, I would have just not bothered with the article if it wasn’t for you pointing that line out
Ah I’ve gotten to the point where I have to define what “frame” and epoch each time base is in before I’ll touch the representation of time( Unix,Gregorian, etc) .To be honest I’m probably just scratching the surface of time problem.
Hell probably the reason we haven’t seen time travellers is we suck at tracking time and you probably need to accurately know your time and place to a very good precision to travel to a given point and we can’t say where and when that is with enough accuracy to facilitate where to land. And people don’t want to land in the earth’s surface or 10000 km away from a stable orbit. Maybe some writer can build that out for a time travel book or to discount it for some reason lol
Yea then they just start shooting down everything randomly,
And really want needs to be modified on the missiles? Sounds more like an airliner issue to me…
First Glonass is a mess, missing quite a few operational satellites Galileo is just ramping up.
Interms of what is broadcast they still work on the same principle satellites broadcast time receiver does something like a linear least squares fit to estimate position, and time.
Mixing all the sources and doing a linear least squares like fit means the bad guy has to spoof more signals, and this system will be more robust but it is susceptible to the same attack just ramped up a bit
Huh what do you propose then, go back to the 1960s and ensure they are only using VOR and DME ground equipment. There isn’t a check sum to check on GPS/GNSS it just a bunch of satellites broadcasting what they think is the correct time. If you jam those and replace them with signals close enough but wrong values you can trick the math that’s used inside the GPS/GNSS receiver that computes the the position (and velocity), and it looks like this signal can be introduced slow enough to trick the receiver in real-world applications. One trick to protect yourself is to ensure the signals you receive are from the direction you expect but we aren’t going to attach directional antennas on every face of a civilian aircraft, to ensure the strongest signal is from the top of the plane and not the bottom. Essentially civil navigation equipment isn’t supposed to be messed with and if it is authorities are supposed to go over and arrest and fine the idiots doing things over the radio they shouldnt. When the bad guy is a government well yea I guess that plan doesn’t work and governing bodies such as ICAO should impose penalties like no commerical aircraft from companies from those countries are not allowed elsewhere.
Would be funner with this kid: https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fbbus95pvpch41.png
1·1 year agodeleted by creator
Don’t worry dinner will be cancelled midway through the appetizers 😔
Asking the age old question, Is it a good idea to microwave this?
Damn sid meiers may have to update the rankings in civ and bump old Dan quale up a few ranks sounds like he isn’t as terrible as he once was