Interesting behavior
Interesting behavior
Agreed, way more efficient and convenient. Where I live customers always bag their own groceries anyway so the only difference is taking 2 seconds to run it through a scanner before putting it in your bag and you never have to stand in line for them or anything. Like I couldn’t care less if the convenience store isn’t giving me great customer service I just wanna grab what I want and get out asap.
Pretty sure most people who’ve used Ai in their work know the results kinda sucks, and only use it because writing a prompt for an LLM is way faster than writing anything yourself.
What does he want the courts to do? Force companies to advertise on twitter?
Because humans haven’t been selectively bred for specific traits.
Because dog breeds are not comparable to genetic differences in humans. They’ve been actively bred for certain characteristics, going through a lot of generations extremely fast in controlled environments in a way that’s impossible in nature. All humans are essentially mongrels. The reason we don’t do racial classification of personality traits in humans isn’t just because it’s morally abhorrent, but also because it doesn’t work, while because of the selective breeding of dogs, there can be big differences in their behaviour due to their breed.
It’s also important that while a dog’s breed does have an influence on it’s behaviour, it’s not absolute, and you can’t actually predict a dog’s behaviour through its breed alone.
Having language models role-play with each other and calling it AI war simulation research is incredibly stupid, but this still made me laugh.
Not sure I agree with the “Human” claim