Reportedly 3 inches taller than I am, and only 10lbs heavier. But he probably couldn’t stretch one of my shirts enough to even get it over his moobs.

I was just (somewhat poorly) answering the ‘why is this even an option’ question above, not trying to justify it.

Even if it does work, it changes nothing but the venue. They’re still facing state charges, and it’s still DA Willis and her team bringing them, it’ll just be a federal judge overseeing with a slightly larger jury pool.

My point wasn’t that it’s a way to avoid the charges, however it will work as a delay tactic.

Not if your understanding of the US Constitution is the same as it was when you were in grade 3.

Not op (nor a lawyer) but as it was explained by an actual lawyer, there’s an argument to be made that since some of the crimes were committed while president he could argue that they were done so as part of his presidential duties. If the judge agrees it could be moved to federal court.

Mark Meadows has already filled a req to remove the case to federal court since he was acting as a federal employee during all the crime-ing.

“Aww hell, my latest lootbox contained erectile dysfunction… I’ll have to buy a few more to try and get rid of it”

This might just be too brave

The Wyze headphones I picked up for $45 do this, along with noise cancellation that’s good enough for flights. I figured it would be standard on any premium headphones.

Just a note about the injunction, it will not survive on appeal. The judge in this case stretched things pretty thin in his argument for the emergency injunction pending trial in this case. Lumping together government agencies reporting TOS violations with other elected officials threatening section 230 into one was just silly. Episode 771 of the Opening Arguments podcast does a better job of explaining the injunction and ongoing case than I ever could.

Meta/Twitter/whoever are also protected by the 1st Amendment when it comes to deciding what they allow on their platform.

A law or ruling that forces social media companies to carry specific speech is unconstitutional.

I always refer to it as “the 4th grade playground definition” of free speech.

Bummer, at least it’s still cheaper but my super cheap 1:1 conversation expires in October.