Absolutely. I was gonna edit my comment to include that but you beat me to the punch.

Very nice build, I love it

If the cops did indeed plant evidence then happy days for the defence since it should be easy to disprove. e.g. by simple handwriting analysis or other such means. But this is fantasy wishful thinking since he did write the words. So stick to the reality here

Handwriting analysis is hardly objective.

He shot the guy and confessed to it.

He’s pleaded not guilty, and unless you have more up to date information, he’s made no confession outside of the alleged note.

Ultimately, there is a better strategy to jury nullification:

https://beyondcourts.org/sites/default/files/2022-07/Jury-Nullification-Toolkit-English_0.pdf

TL;DR: It is most effective to plant seeds of doubt when reasonable, and legitimate ones. For this particular case, it would be the fact that the eyebrows don’t match between pictures, the police said they had found the backpack in NY only to then say they found him with his backpack at McDonalds, the fact that Luigi claims shit was planted on him and the police have a running history of planting evidence to suit their needs, etc.

While it won’t help you getting suicided, setting up a deadman’s switch on the cloud that will release your testimony is definitely worth doing.

And that’s why we fight back where we can and weaponize what we can; that’s why we use jury nullification in cases like these.

It wasn’t Luigi.

Geneally, you don’t become a CEO without being a shitty person, and therefore a shitty parent.

The mechanism is irrelevant. Murder is still murder even if through insurance denials, pollution, or any other bullshit legal ways of killing people.

I’m all for it, though does anybody know a good place to find these unwanted machines?

Agreed. If they both had heart attacks tomorrow I would be glad to not hear about them anymore.

Who is “they” and how might they “fix” the justice system ?

The oligarchs that own the country.

Are you proposing that allowing a jury of peers drawn from this public ought to be able to make up the law based on the vibe of cases before them ?

I’m proposing that the inherent protections the judicial system gives people be used to protect Luigi.

Justice is dead so long as billionaires can cause immeasurable death and suffering without repercussions.

You’re operating under the incorrect assumption that the public can control the law.

If that were the case you’d be right. But as of right now, this is the only check on their power. And it is an intentional check. The 2A was put in place to fight tyrants if it came to it, and it is quickly coming to it.

He’s pleading not guilty, claiming that the cops planted that shit.

And the cops routinely lie and plant evidence, so it’s not out of the question.

That’s been on my mind for a while now. They’re both assholes who can’t listen to “no” without throwing a fit. They’re eventually going to disagree on something, and it’s going to turn nasty.

So I’ll be ready with popcorn for when it eventually happens. Fascism always destroys itself, just not before killing everything it can.

Higher effort, higher reward

Don’t know what you’re talking about. They clearly have the wrong guy.

Maybe they should fix the justice system if they want juries to actually act like they’re intended to.

But they won’t, billionaires, CEOs, business execs, and other parasites will continue to do what they like and harm who they like with a slap on the wrist at most.

deleted by creator

Good.

Probably the best option. If it’s last 20 years, it can probably do another 20. And anything you find currently on the market will struggle to beat that.

It should have been Bernie in 2016, yet here we are.