![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
A 12 year old on an ebike killed a 66 year old that was riding a bicycle at night without lights. Maybe set age limits? Is the solution too obvious? Traffic education and enforcement?
A 12 year old on an ebike killed a 66 year old that was riding a bicycle at night without lights. Maybe set age limits? Is the solution too obvious? Traffic education and enforcement?
I’d love to see a crank on EVs to power the low voltage stuff in emergencies. How many amps does the car startup take? 15A? Maybe bicycle pedals.
It’s much much much cheaper to use the same 12V systems that other cars use.
Kia/hyundai solved this by having a disconnect on their (li-ion) 12V battery. When the voltage gets low it completely isolates the battery. There is a button inside the car that reconnects it right before starting the car.
An explosive hatch! Or ejection seat! Love it
It seems pretty obvious, but also, it would be nice to see improvements in this area.
Surprisingly, if you google “hydrogen airship revival”, you will find that there are many companies trying to build airships.
Since the non-flammable helium has less lifting capacity and is non-renewable and expensive, they are trying to use hydrogen safely. Good luck…
Understood. CG-NAT has been so annoying, I would love for IPv6 to completely replace v4 ASAP
I figure the mobile carrier was blocking incoming connections to my phone. This was a couple of years ago, things might have changed since then.
Thank you
I didn’t mean prevent, just makes it harder by default. You can still open connections from within the NAT
Edit: I do admit to failing at accessing my IPv6 PC from my IPv6 phone
Edit2: apparently NAT is full of security bugs
You’re talking about NAT traversal? We do have control over which we apps we run though?
Edit: apparently NAT is full of bugs
I still have to initiate the outgoing UDP. Are you talking about the specific case where any software running on my host can initiate it without me requesting?
Edit: apparently NAT is full of security bugs
The main benefit of a NAT is that by default it prevents all external access to the hosts inside the network. Any port you have open is not accessible unless explicitly forwarded.
This has a lot of security benefits. Regardless, everything you said is sounds true to me.
Why do you say NAT doesn’t make a network more secure?
Cheapest I’ve seen was $105
And they break guitars
I see so many riders without lights wearing dark clothes at night. Lights are ridiculously cheap too.