• GregorGizeh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As someone not into the hobby (although I have a cookie cutter mechanical keyboard), what is the point of having that few keys? Portability? Otherwise i find it more cumbersome than efficient having to constantly use modifiers to access the full range of keys I might want to press.

    Edit: this was meant as a reply to the guy with a 60% keyboard

    • cybirdman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a user of a small TKL keyboard, I can say from my own experience having a small keyboard makes it easy and less strenuous to switch between the mouse and keyboard since they are so close together. I also find I don’t really miss the extra keys, I can do my job just fine if not better without them, because of the added benefit of moving fast.

      • GroggyKon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I currently do a data heavy job and almost never use my keypad. Just can’t come to terms with letting it go. 96% might be the step that gets me to ditch the numpad!

        • jiji@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I use my keypad a lot for my job so I’ve always been kind of jealous of the people who can use the slimmed down keyboards. This is a cute little compromise and I’m glad to know it exists!

    • lexBrannigan@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      To me the main advantage of having less physical keys but a full layout available via modifiers is, that your hands won’t have to leave the home-row. Working like this is not only much more comfortable but also a lot more efficient. (At least for me)