• person420@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The problem with your analogy is the third choice wasn’t don’t get shot. We had three choices.

    1. Choose to get shot in the arm with a .22
    2. Choose to get shot in the arm with a .50
    3. Do nothing and get shot in the arm with a .50

    This wasn’t the trolley car problem. Simple game theory can be applied.

    I agree the Dems need to do better but Trump is objectively worse in every way. Forget his political views, he’s just a garbage human being. He’s everything that’s bad about humanity, or at least of capitalism, and it saddens me that 60% of my fellow Americans are just cool with that.

    • Narauko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      Yeah, I agree, but the problem is that there is never a 3rd option and so option 1 has gone over decades from getting just getting a purple nurple to getting shot by airsoft, then to a BB gun, then a pellet gun, and now a .22. Everything only ratchets one direction.

      The Two Party system and game theory has put us in this position, the elite class has captured both options so they are fine no matter what, and the majority of lawmakers on both sides object to voting methods that will allow the possibility of third parties to emerge.

      The question becomes which option 2 is “not bad” enough to risk allowing when the opportunity is taken to break the machinery behind option 1 and replace it with something better? We have no guarantee that anything after this will constitute a better opportunity.

      The Republicans should do the same, take this chance with Trump having hijacked the whole system to jettison it a remake a functional conservative/center right party without the likes of McConnell. Break the party, replace the politicians and make reforms like ranked choice or STAR voting so everything isn’t zero-sum.