https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/39616364?scrollToComments=true
https://lemmy.world/u/sag@lemm.ee
https://lemmy.world/modlog/?userId=1957570
Underage, you will be unbanned when you turn 18 (happy birthday in advance)
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/39616364?scrollToComments=true
https://lemmy.world/u/sag@lemm.ee
https://lemmy.world/modlog/?userId=1957570
Underage, you will be unbanned when you turn 18 (happy birthday in advance)
So obeying any laws whatsoever is inherently undesirable?
Obeying laws that serve no purpose is a bootlicker exercise
Exactly my point.
How about the laws that serve a purpose?
Do you think this is one of those? Do you think a law designed to favor conservative parental rights movements who seek to oppress and own children, and cut them off from their support networks serves a valid or reasonable purpose?
If the law has a clear purpose and that purpose is beneficial to the working class, I don’t need it tp be a law. I just go along with it because that’s how we make society work.
Not necessarily, e.g., if they align with your values. But age restricting access to a general purpose platform seems very nanny state to me.
There is a group of Lemmy users that use the “law” to justify their censorship behavior and demands.
It is getting tiring.
But sure if instance owner doesn’t wants young people posting on there, they can just block. This silly reasons are just silly though.
Just say you don’t want to deal with it and move on.
This appeal to authorita is disingenuous IMHO
It depends on your opinion. Anarchy isn’t a prescriptive unitary ideology, and it’s got a lot of different things behind it and subgroups and whatever. You can have Stirner’s Egoist perspective on laws, being that you just follow whatever laws suit your own ego, or you can have the Illegalists’ perspective on laws, that they’re all worth breaking.
Now I know you’re not only not a real anarchist or have any understanding of anarchism whatsoever but likely a bootlicker too.