I think it’s more that his “preference” implies he’s a bit of a shallow fuckboi who views women as objects with expiration dates. Or at least that he views relationships as mere transactions.
I’m not sure why everyone is surprised that an actor might not actually be as nice as he seems in his PR appearances 🤷♂️
Take furries. Using a moralistic approach such as yours I could conclude that they are freaks who encourage bestiality. Instead I think that consenting adults can do what they want as long as they are not harming anybody (this part was obviously implied, but suddenly you lost the ability to use context and imply things when it was convenient to build a strawman).
Take women with control-related kinks. Using your moralistic approach I could go tell them that they are victims of bla bla bla who internalized bla bla bla, and that ultimately men who accept to please those kinks perpetrate bla bla bla. Instead, I think that consenting adults can get off the way they want.
I would like to know the mental gymnastic to bend that “moral principle” so that you don’t end up against mixed race couples or similar, because if you consider people only expression of their social group, you absolutely can conclude that some (all?) of those relationships represent and perpetrate the same power inequality that exists between their demographics.
Elsewhere you suggested to people to “check your own biases”, maybe you can take your own suggestion here and try to see if your analysis fell short.
I think it’s more that his “preference” implies he’s a bit of a shallow fuckboi who views women as objects with expiration dates. Or at least that he views relationships as mere transactions.
I’m not sure why everyone is surprised that an actor might not actually be as nice as he seems in his PR appearances 🤷♂️
“We don’t judge other people sexual preferences, unless they are the wrong ones according to me”
I definitely judge pedophiles, because a “preference” is not the same thing as a sexual orientation.
You don’t?
Wonder why…
Yes, it’s the same thing here, great parallel.
Not my fault you’re a strawmanning nonce defender.
Right, then let me elaborate.
Take furries. Using a moralistic approach such as yours I could conclude that they are freaks who encourage bestiality. Instead I think that consenting adults can do what they want as long as they are not harming anybody (this part was obviously implied, but suddenly you lost the ability to use context and imply things when it was convenient to build a strawman).
Take women with control-related kinks. Using your moralistic approach I could go tell them that they are victims of bla bla bla who internalized bla bla bla, and that ultimately men who accept to please those kinks perpetrate bla bla bla. Instead, I think that consenting adults can get off the way they want.
I could go on, but the point is clear, hopefully.
On this topic you are a bigot. You are a bigot because you are essentially using a dogma that women can only act as victims of a system that oppresses them and nothing else. You are stripping away agency, and applying rigid moral rules grounded in that dogma. You are using a very similar approach that homophobes use to hate on gay people, you just think that you are doing it for good© reasons to defend oppressed minorities; or singular actually, because this only applies to women dating older men I suppose? Or you also have other definitions for wrong couples? Black woman/white man? Indigenous woman/white man? Poor woman/rich man? And what if this was a lesbian couple? 25yo woman/50+ woman?
I would like to know the mental gymnastic to bend that “moral principle” so that you don’t end up against mixed race couples or similar, because if you consider people only expression of their social group, you absolutely can conclude that some (all?) of those relationships represent and perpetrate the same power inequality that exists between their demographics.
Elsewhere you suggested to people to “check your own biases”, maybe you can take your own suggestion here and try to see if your analysis fell short.
You seem mad
Projection ;)
Just an observation
A fool can observe an event without understanding it.
Ok well I’m gonna play some video games, you continue to rant to whoever will listen about leo