• libertyforever@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The Republicans had no problems with her gender, her race, not her position. They voted for her almost unanimously. Not sure why you said the best defense is what she said aren’t illegal. Have you even heard why Republican senators voted for her?

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Your best defense is, “She is free to speak on the point of view that you don’t like,” which is another way of saying, “The things she’s said aren’t illegal.” That, and, “If you don’t like her you’re a racist and sexist.” Absolutely pathetic, lazy, and stupid arguments.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              I know her positions. The point is that you haven’t said a word defending her based on those positions or any other relevant quality. All you can say in her defense is that her positions aren’t illegal to hold and that she’s a minority. That’s literally it.

              By the way, I still haven’t heard you say that the Democrats should’ve been more hawkish in the Middle East like Tulsi wanted, so I assume you’re aware that you’re full of shit.