• Schorsch@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    18 hours ago

    nb4 someone laughs at us Germans for pulling out of nuclear power: No, nuclear is not cheap. It’s literally the most expensive way to generate electricity. Solar is cheap and better for the environment.

    • troed@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Nuclear is cheaper than your average electricity cost.

      I know because I’m Swedish and you use us as your cheap electricity.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      No, nuclear is not cheap. It’s literally the most expensive way to generate electricity

      Source?

      Beats coal anytime. Or Russian gas.

      • Schorsch@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I obviously don’t consider fossil fuels as an option. And I do doubt that it’s cheaper to build a nuclear plant compared do building a coal or gas fired one.

    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Nuclear is reliable, predictable and stable 24/7 source. Solar not so much and possibly not that great for the environment if we don’t figure out what to do with used solar panels. Also their production is not exactly clean. Whereas nuclear requires a wasted fuel storage somewhere and the fuel will eventually run out of radiation in some hundreds of thousands years.

      • Schorsch@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Storing something extremely dangerous extremely safely for “some hundreds of thousands of years” doesn’t exactly sound cheap, does it?