• WillStealYourUsername@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    in one instance, sure? that can’t be generalized to all populations, nor does it account for intersex individuals

    https://forensicsdigest.com/scope-of-forensic-anthropology-estimation-of-gender-from-human-skeletal-remains/

    Edit: This one is way more relevant https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2015/908535

    Edit: The context here is a stupid gotcha by transphobes, and how it isn’t even correct. Keep in mind in the future when they find our bones that our current society is very mobile and global. I don’t exactly live in the same place as the rest of my family, so they will only have random assorted skeletons from people from lots of different places to compare to and will therefore have reduced accuracy when guessing my natal sex.

    • Reyali@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Wow, thanks for sharing. I was definitely under the impression that skeletons could be identified with at least a reasonable amount of certainty. (Though maybe what I thought I knew was that women who had children could be identified?)

      Either way, I appreciate the links!