• Brekky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Is that true? I thought recycling was giving new purpose to an old object. Reuse to me implies another person using the object but in the same way it was originally intended.

    • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      No, that’s reusing. Recycling is breaking down the product into materials so it can be used to make new stuff.

      The cycle in recycle means the production cycle.

      • lengau@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Given that this is changing the product itself, it’s more repurposing than reusing, which I’d say fits between reuse and recycle.

        • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          It works better if you think about the raw materials rather than the whole product;

          Reduce the amount of plastic you use
          Reuse the plastic you already have
          Recycle the plastic you can’t use anymore

    • SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      What you’re describing is just giving/loaning/borrowing which don’t start with R but still contribute to a moneyless value economy which is still great for improving the efficient sharing of the resource pool toward desirable ends