• Arrakis@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I imagine it’s not mentioned because of the whole “not all victims are abusers so it’s somewhat irrelevant” schtick. You seem to be getting a bit confused, are you white knighting for reason/due process to prevail or not?

    • tegs_terry@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I wasn’t mentioning it in that spirit, certainly not in his defence. I think there’s a difference between understanding and condonation that many (to wit, you) fail to appreciate.

      Also, I don’t think advocating reason and due process should be stigmatised, whatever the motivation.

      • Arrakis@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Then why were you mentioning it?

        No one is stigmatising it, you just seem to be doing a poor job of sticking to it.

        • tegs_terry@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because I don’t think it’s common knowledge, it goes some way to explaining (not excusing mind you, before you start salivating) what may or may not have happened. What’s more, I don’t think people want to know - or want others to know - because it muddies the waters and they just want good vs. bad.

          I’m doing a great job sticking to my objectivity, it’s just that when all you’re surrounded by is half the story, anything contrary to the picture that that paints, looks like complete polar opposition.