• Kuvwert@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      https://ibb.co/wVNsn5H

      https://ibb.co/HpK5G5Pp

      https://ibb.co/sp1wGMFb

      https://ibb.co/4wyKhkRH

      https://ibb.co/WpBTZPRm

      https://ibb.co/0yP73j6G

      Note that my tests were via groq and the r1 70B distilled llama variant (the 2nd smartest version afaik)

      Edit 1:

      Incidentally… I propositioned a coworker to answer the same question. This is the summarized conversation I had:

      Me: “Hey Billy, can you answer a question? in under 3 seconds answer my following question”

      Billy: “sure”

      Me: “How many As are in abracadabra 3.2.1”

      Billy: “4” (answered in less than 3 seconds)

      Me: “nope”

      I’m gonna poll the office and see how many people get it right with the same opportunity the ai had.

      Edit 2: The second coworker said “6” in about 5 seconds

      Edit 3: Third coworker said 4, in 3 seconds

      Edit 4: I asked two more people and one of them got it right… But I’m 60% sure she heard me asking the previous employee, but if she didnt we’re at 1/5

      In probably done with this game for the day.

      I’m pretty flabbergasted with the results of my very unscientific experiment, but now I can say (with a mountain of anecdotal juice) that with letter counting, R1 70b is wildly faster and more accurate than humans .

        • rdri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          It didn’t, I just wanted a short reply. Though it failed when I asked again in the same chat. But when asked to split the word to 2 parts it became sure that the correct answer is 3.

          Here is the fun part

          Certainly! Let’s split “strawberry” into two equal parts and count the 'r’s in each:

          1. First half: “strawb”
            Letters: S, T, R, A, W, B
            'r’s: 1 (at position 3)

          2. Second half: “erry”
            Letters: E, R, R, Y
            'r’s: 2 (at positions 2 and 3)

          Now, summing them: 1 (first half) + 2 (second half) = 3 'r’s.

          Wait, this contradicts my earlier correction. It seems I made another mistake. Let’s carefully recount:

          • First half: “strawb”
            'r’s: 1 (at position 3)

          • Second half: “erry”
            'r’s: 1 (only one ‘r’ at position 2; the third letter is ‘r’ but already counted in the first half).

          Wait, no—this is getting confusing. Let’s re-examine the entire word:

          Full word: S, T, R, A, W, B, E, R, R, Y
          'r’s: Positions 3, 8, and 9 → 3 'r’s.

          I apologize for the back-and-forth. The correct total is 3 'r’s in “strawberry.” Thank you for your patience as I worked through this! 😊

          • blakenong@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s a lot of processing just to count letters. Hopefully it can add numbers without splitting the number ;)

            • ikt@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              That’s a lot of processing just to count letters

              feel free to ask Google/Bing/Your favourite search engine to do the same :P

            • Pieisawesome@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              It’s because LLMs don’t work with letters. They work with tokens that are converted to vectors.

              They literally don’t see the word “strawberry” in order to count the letters.

              Splitting the letter probably separates them into individual tokens